In LSD Veritas -
Benvinguts al meu racó.
Todo está sujeto a interpretaciones, por lo tanto la realidad es subjetiva y las formas de pensar y vivir son caóticas y conflictivas. El pensamiento enmascara a menudo la verdad de los hechos. La realidad ya no puede ser objetiva. Todo pasa por el filtro del pensamiento y el individuo deja de observar los hechos tal como son.
sábado, 29 de octubre de 2011
Brave New World (TV) (1980) Burt Brinckerhoff VOSE
Adaptación de la mítica novela de Aldous Huxley sobre una sociedad basada en el placer sin implicaciones morales, el amor olvidado en favor del sexo casual, el control de la población con drogas legales... y la manipulación genética, por la que los seres humanos son creados y clonados en laboratorios, recibiendo las necesidades genéticas de la clase social a la que vayan a pertencer. Bernard Marx es un Macho Alfa con una extraña inclinación hacia el libre albedrío, enamorado de una ciudadana ejemplar llamada Lenina Disney. Durante la visita de ambos a una reserva de "salvajes" conocen a un joven llamado John, al que deciden llevar a la civilización... sin saber que la identidad de John podría provocar un gran escándalo y sacudir la civilización de arriba a abajo.
Enlace emule: Un mundo feliz
Enlace emule: Un mundo feliz.
Enlace subtítulos castellano: 1 part
Enlace subtítulos castellano: 2 part
La película más fidedigna que he visto sobre la novela, aunque la copia es pobre en cuanto a la calidad de la imagen (entre otras cosas porque no he encontrado ninguna mejor), merece ser vista.
jueves, 27 de octubre de 2011
Joan Peiró i la justícia de Franco (Xavier Muntanyà, 2004) VOSE
Dirección: Xavier Muntanyà
Año: 2004
Idioma: Català - Catalán, Subtítulos castellano.
"Joan Peiró i la justicia de Franco" recoge testimonios de sus hijos y nietos (Guillermina y Joan), así como de Isidro Guardia, que estuvo con él en las prisiones, y diversos compañeros y amigos.
Joan Peiró i la justícia de Franco (Xavier Muntanyà, 2004).avi [370.84 Mb]
Enlace emule subtítulos: Joan Peiro.Subtítulos castellano..srt [51.4 Kb]
Enlace megaupload: http://www.megaupload.com/?d=XE2BWGP0
Enlace subtítulos castellano: http://www.megaupload.com/?d=SBCX911G
Militancia sindical: Según él mismo su militancia sindical se inició en 1906, comenzando a tener cargos de responsabilidad entre 1915 y 1920, tales como secretario general de la Federación Española de Vidrieros y Cristaleros (1916-1920) y director de las publicaciones La Colmena Obrera (órgano de los sindicatos de Badalona) y El Vidrio (portavoz de los vidrieros federados). Su agudeza intelectual le llevaría más adelante a ser director del diario Solidaridad Obrera (1930) y del también diario Catalunya (1937).
Muy influenciado por el sindicalismo revolucionario francés, comenzó a tener tareas de responsabilidad en la CNT tras el llamado Congreso de Sants (1918) de la regional catalana de esta organización en la que, gracias a su capacidad de trabajo, dotes de organizador y gran prestigio, desempeñaría los más altos cargos.
En el Congreso de La Comedia (1919) defendió las federaciones de industria que fueron rechazadas en aquella ocasión.
Los duros años veinte: Durante los años veinte sufrió la represión desencadenada por el Estado y la patronal contra el movimiento obrero. Tan solo en 1920 sufrió dos atentados y fue detenido y encarcelado en Soria y Vitoria.
En 1922 fue elegido secretario general de la CNT, celebrándose durante su gestión la Conferencia de Zaragoza, en la que se aprobó la salida de la organización de la Internacional Sindical Roja y su afiliación a la reconstituida Asociación Internacional de los Trabajadores (AIT). En esta misma conferencia Peiró defendió junto a Seguí, Pestaña y Viadiu la llamada «moción política», muy criticada por los sectores más ortodoxos de la organización.
Se estableció en Mataró en 1922 y en 1925 dirigió la constitución de la Cooperativa del Vidrio que ya había intentado organizar con anterioridad. Con la dictadura de Primo de Rivera la CNT fue ilegalizada, clausuradas sus sedes y suspendidas sus publicaciones. Muchos de sus militantes fueron detenidos (como Peiró que fue encarcelado en 1925, 1927 y 1928). Este último año fue nuevamente elegido Secretario General de la CNT.
Criticó a la UGT por su defensa de jurados mixtos durante aquella dictadura y también a Pestaña, con el que sin embargo coincidía en otros aspectos. También criticó al sector más anarquista del sindicato, y a pesar de que se afilió a la FAI nunca militó en ella, defendiendo por el contrario una organización de masas y más sindicalista, y oponiéndose a los grupos de acción y a las minorías de militantes dirigentes.
República y Guerra Civil: En 1930 firmó el manifiesto de «Inteligencia Republicana» por lo que recibió numerosas críticas internas que le llevaron a retirar su firma. Siguió defendiendo las federaciones de industria hasta que en el congreso de la CNT de 1931 en Madrid consiguió un apoyo masivo frente a las tesis faístas. En ese mismo congreso apoyó la ponencia sobre la «Posición de la CNT frente a las Cortes Constituyentes» en la que se defendía que la proclamación de la República podría suponer un avance para la clase trabajadora. Esta ponencia fue aprobada con algunas modificaciones a pesar de la oposición de los sectores faístas que veían en ella un apoyo a la maquinaria política burguesa.
También en 1931 firmó junto a otros 29 destacados cenetistas, entre los que se encontraba Ángel Pestaña, el «Manifiesto Treintista», donde se analizaba la situación económica y social de España y se criticaba tanto al gobierno republicano como a los sectores cenetistas más radicalizados. La reacción de estos últimos provocó la dimisión de Pestaña de su puesto en el comité nacional de la organización y la salida de los sindicatos de Sabadell a los que posteriormente se fueron añadiendo otros que acabaron constituyendo un bloque denominado «sindicatos de oposición». Aunque Peiró participó en esta escisión no desempeñó responsabilidades destacadas y trató de tender puentes para evitar la ruptura definitiva. La reunificación se produjo en 1936.
Tras la sublevación de los militares rebeldes, Peiró actuó de vicepresidente del comité antifascista de Mataró, marchándose sus hijos al frente. Defendió la entrada de la CNT en la Generalitat de Cataluña y en el Gobierno de la República y planteó una República Social Federal como forma de estado cuando se acabase la guerra.
Junto a García Oliver, Federica Montseny y Juan López fue uno de los cuatro ministros anarquistas en el gobierno de Largo Caballero, encargado de la cartera de Industria. Desde este puesto elaboró el decreto de incautaciones e intervención en la industria y proyectó la creación de un bando de crédito industrial, aunque muchos de estos proyectos fueron recortados, ralentizados o diluidos por Negrín.
A la caída del gobierno de Largo Caballero regresó a Mataró y a la Cooperativa del Vidrio, dedicándose también a dar conferencias sobre su paso por el gobierno y a publicar duros artículos contra el PCE por sus actuaciones contra el POUM.
En 1938 entró nuevamente en el gobierno, ahora presidido por Negrín, aunque no con el rango de ministro sino de comisario general de Energía Eléctrica, manteniendo una actitud antiderrotista y proponiendo una cierta revisión del anarcosindicalismo a la luz del desarrollo la revolución y la guerra.
Exilio, captura y muerte: El 5 de febrero de 1939 atravesó la frontera francesa, siendo brevemente detenido en Perpiñán, desde donde se dirigió a Narbona para reunirse con su familia. Más tarde marchó a París al objeto de representar a la CNT en la Junta de Auxilio a los Republicanos Españoles (JARE), consistiendo su misión en sacar a los refugiados cenetistas de los campos de concentración franceses y facilitarles su traslado a México.
Tras la invasión nazi intentó huir, pero fue detenido cuando se dirigía a Narbona y devuelto a París, donde las autoridades francesas emitieron contra él una orden de expulsión del país al objeto de sustraerlo a la acción de la Gestapo y así pasar a la zona no ocupada y de allí a México. Pero fue detenido nuevamente por las tropas nazis y llevado a Tréveris (Alemania).
En enero de 1941 el ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores franquista solicitó su extradición, que se materializó en Irún el 19 de febrero de ese mismo año, incumpliendo las leyes francesas e internacionales (se unía así a los casos de Lluís Companys, presidente de la Generalitat, Julián Zugazagoitia, socialista bilbaíno, o Francisco Cruz Salido, responsable de la oficina de prensa de la JARE).
Se le trasladó a la Dirección General de Seguridad de Madrid, donde fue interrogado y torturado. Iniciado el proceso y aplazado excepcionalmente, se le trasladó a Valencia en abril de 1941. En diciembre de este año se abrió el proceso sumarial en el que Peiró contó con numerosos testimonios a su favor emitidos por instituciones y personas del nuevo régimen. Sin embargo, su reiterada negativa a la propuesta del gobierno de dirigir los sindicatos franquistas determinaría su condena.
En mayo de 1942 el fiscal formuló las acusaciones, en junio le fue nombrado el defensor militar de oficio y el 21 de julio fue pronunciada la sentencia de muerte. Tres días más tarde sería fusilado junto a otros seis cenetistas en el campo de tiro de Paterna.
Obras:
Trayectoria de la Confederación Nacional del Trabajo.
Ideas sobre Sindicalismo y Anarquismo.
Perill a la reraguarda.
Problemas y cintarazos.
Problemas del sindicalismo y del Anarquismo.
sábado, 22 de octubre de 2011
Gaddafi visto por "Red Voltaire" y "El Mundo".
Gaddafi visto por "Red Voltaire" y "El Mundo".
Diferentes puntos de vista sobre la figura de Gaddafi, pueden distorsionar la realidad del conflicto en Libia sobre la opinión pública en general,como se aprecia en este caso.
Compilación de artítulos publicados en el Mundo: Sin lágrimas para Gadafi:
Trípoli sigue enzarzada en una interminable celebración. Ni siquiera la conquista de la ciudad por los rebeldes y el desmoronamiento del régimen concertó tanta alegría como la muerte de Muamar Gadafi.
Los tripolitanos respiran tranquilos, pues ya saben con certeza que el
Hermano Líder no puede volver nunca más a acechar sus vidas.
En el barrio italiano, situado en el centro de la ciudad, bordeando la Plaza de los Mártires, llevan sin agua desde hace diez días. Pero una corriente verde, negra y roja fluye por las calles. Ni una lágrima se ha vertido por la triste suerte del coronel, quien fuera un día aclamado como el ‘padre’ de los libios. La población del país no perdona al dictador la feroz represión que desató contra las ansias de libertad durante los últimos meses.
Tampoco olvidan los últimos 42 años bajo su yugo. En Bab al Aziziya, el complejo presidencial del régimen, se ha improvisado un zoco popular. Allí se venden animales domésticos, alimentos y ropa. Hay hasta peleas de perros para divertimento de los más aguerridos donde antes se alzaba el monumento del puño que aplasta un avión, símbolo del antioccidentalismo de Gadafi.
Muchos de los que se acercan al mercado, pasan también a ver la que fuera mansión del dictador. El complejo residencial luce desvencijado:
todos los muebles, los libros y electrodomésticos han sido saqueados;
la piscina, cegada; el césped, arrasado. "He venido a ver la casa de
Gadafi. Estoy tan feliz… Ya me alegró que huyera, pero ahora, saber que ha muerto, me llena de felicidad", confesaba con candidez Fatma Hqaiq.
Nuri Tumi también se muestra eufórico ante la muerte del sátrapa libio. “Por supuesto que me alegro de que lo mataran. No podía tener otro final”, afirma. Mohamed el Kesh, portavoz del Consejo Nacional de Transición (CNT), difiere de esta opinión. “Yo no quería que mataran a Gadafi; quería que sufriera. Quería ponerlo en una jaula y llevarlo ante un tribunal. Para él, la muerte ha sido una salida”, afirma a ELMUNDO.es.
A las puertas de la transición Entre las miles de personas que participaron en el rezo del viernes, Hamim Mohamed Nuri, de 44 años, escondía una razón especial para transmitir sus anhelos en sus oraciones. “Pienso en mi país, Siria. Me gustaría que este día llegara a mi tierra. Que un golpe de Estado derroque a Bashar Asad”, revela.
Aniquilado Gadafi, la guerra ha llegado a su fin. Y ahora, una vez que las armas acallen su estruendo, el CNT se prepara para dirigir la transición política. Lo primero es la Declaración de Liberación, con la que el país iniciará una nueva etapa. Anoche, las autoridades revolucionarias retrasaron este comunicado de hoy a mañana domingo.
El pronunciamiento –que hará el presidente del CNT, Mustafa Abdel Yalil- se hará en Bengasi, la capital de la revolución libia, donde todo empezó un 17 de febrero. “En unos días, quizá en una semana, se anunciará en Trípoli el Gobierno de Transición”, según señalaron a este medio fuentes del CNT. Los miembros del Gabinete interino serán monitorizados por el CNT, un órgano de 55 miembros que tendrá derecho de veto sobre el cuerpo legislativo.
Ese gobierno provisional se disolverá en ocho meses, según la Hoja de Ruta elaborada por el CNT. Aunque el viceprimer ministro, Ali Tarhuni, admitió que podría prolongarse durante más tiempo. Tras este periodo, los libios tendrán que votar en referéndum una Constitución y elegir su primer Ejecutivo democrático.
Muchas dudas surgen sobre la suerte de aquellos que un día simpatizaron con el régimen de Gadafi. “Perdonaremos a los que apoyaron a Gadafi si no tienen sangre en sus manos”, afirma Haizam al Amri, un ingeniero informático que fue forzado a trabajar del lado del régimen hasta que huyó a Túnez para unirse a la rebelión. “Ellos aún viven en la oscuridad, pero ahora es el tiempo de la luz”, añade.
El portavoz del CNT, Mohamed el Kesh, se mostró también partidario de una amnistía para los que no cometieron ningún crimen. Sin embargo, El Kesh no indicó si existe la consigna desde el CNT de detener y entregar a las autoridades a los progadafistas. Ante el caos que reina en Libia –donde cada hombre tiene al menos un arma- cualquiera puede tomarse la justicia por su mano.
La OTAN no sabía que estaba atacando el convoy de Gadafi:
Los embajadores de los países aliados acordaron de forma preliminar concluir las operaciones ese día, y "tomaremos la decisión definitiva a comienzos de la próxima semana" después de mantener consultas con la ONU y el CNT, ha dicho Rasmussen en una rueda de prensa. Hasta finales de mes, la Alianza Atlántica reducirá progresivamente las capacidades de su misión, si bien seguirá controlando la situación y con medios "para responder a las amenazas a los civiles si fuera necesario", añadió.
El anuncio se produjo después de una disputada reunión -sólo un día después de la muerte del dictador libio Muamar Gadafi- y en la que las diferencias entre los aliados hicieron que el acuerdo llegara cuatro horas más tarde de lo previsto.
El comandante supremo de la OTAN en Europa, el general estadounidense James Stavridis, había anunciado antes del inicio de la reunión que iba a proponer a los países de la Alianza el fin de la misión militar en Libia.
Sin embargo, en la reunión hubo distintas posturas entre los aliados: desde los que apoyaban concluir ya la misión hasta los que pedían continuar un tiempo más hasta que la situación en Libia se haya estabilizado.
Una operación legítima
En el barrio italiano, situado en el centro de la ciudad, bordeando la Plaza de los Mártires, llevan sin agua desde hace diez días. Pero una corriente verde, negra y roja fluye por las calles. Ni una lágrima se ha vertido por la triste suerte del coronel, quien fuera un día aclamado como el ‘padre’ de los libios. La población del país no perdona al dictador la feroz represión que desató contra las ansias de libertad durante los últimos meses.
Tampoco olvidan los últimos 42 años bajo su yugo. En Bab al Aziziya, el complejo presidencial del régimen, se ha improvisado un zoco popular. Allí se venden animales domésticos, alimentos y ropa. Hay hasta peleas de perros para divertimento de los más aguerridos donde antes se alzaba el monumento del puño que aplasta un avión, símbolo del antioccidentalismo de Gadafi.
Nuri Tumi también se muestra eufórico ante la muerte del sátrapa libio. “Por supuesto que me alegro de que lo mataran. No podía tener otro final”, afirma. Mohamed el Kesh, portavoz del Consejo Nacional de Transición (CNT), difiere de esta opinión. “Yo no quería que mataran a Gadafi; quería que sufriera. Quería ponerlo en una jaula y llevarlo ante un tribunal. Para él, la muerte ha sido una salida”, afirma a ELMUNDO.es.
A las puertas de la transición Entre las miles de personas que participaron en el rezo del viernes, Hamim Mohamed Nuri, de 44 años, escondía una razón especial para transmitir sus anhelos en sus oraciones. “Pienso en mi país, Siria. Me gustaría que este día llegara a mi tierra. Que un golpe de Estado derroque a Bashar Asad”, revela.
Aniquilado Gadafi, la guerra ha llegado a su fin. Y ahora, una vez que las armas acallen su estruendo, el CNT se prepara para dirigir la transición política. Lo primero es la Declaración de Liberación, con la que el país iniciará una nueva etapa. Anoche, las autoridades revolucionarias retrasaron este comunicado de hoy a mañana domingo.
El pronunciamiento –que hará el presidente del CNT, Mustafa Abdel Yalil- se hará en Bengasi, la capital de la revolución libia, donde todo empezó un 17 de febrero. “En unos días, quizá en una semana, se anunciará en Trípoli el Gobierno de Transición”, según señalaron a este medio fuentes del CNT. Los miembros del Gabinete interino serán monitorizados por el CNT, un órgano de 55 miembros que tendrá derecho de veto sobre el cuerpo legislativo.
Ese gobierno provisional se disolverá en ocho meses, según la Hoja de Ruta elaborada por el CNT. Aunque el viceprimer ministro, Ali Tarhuni, admitió que podría prolongarse durante más tiempo. Tras este periodo, los libios tendrán que votar en referéndum una Constitución y elegir su primer Ejecutivo democrático.
Muchas dudas surgen sobre la suerte de aquellos que un día simpatizaron con el régimen de Gadafi. “Perdonaremos a los que apoyaron a Gadafi si no tienen sangre en sus manos”, afirma Haizam al Amri, un ingeniero informático que fue forzado a trabajar del lado del régimen hasta que huyó a Túnez para unirse a la rebelión. “Ellos aún viven en la oscuridad, pero ahora es el tiempo de la luz”, añade.
El portavoz del CNT, Mohamed el Kesh, se mostró también partidario de una amnistía para los que no cometieron ningún crimen. Sin embargo, El Kesh no indicó si existe la consigna desde el CNT de detener y entregar a las autoridades a los progadafistas. Ante el caos que reina en Libia –donde cada hombre tiene al menos un arma- cualquiera puede tomarse la justicia por su mano.
La OTAN no sabía que estaba atacando el convoy de Gadafi:
La OTAN aseguró este viernes que sus comandantes desconocían que Muamar Gadafi viajaba en el convoy que sus aviones bombardearon mientras huía de la ciudad de Sirte. La operación terminó por permitir a las fuerzas rebeldes la captura del dictador libio.
En un comunicado, la Alianza Atlántica intentó aclarar su participación en los acontecimientos del jueves. Según explicó, sus aviones divisaron un grupo de unos 75 vehículos que abandonaba Sirte "a gran velocidad". Se trataba de un convoy que transportaba "una cantidad sustancial de armas y munición", lo que "planteaba una amenaza significativa para la población civil local".
La aviación aliada lanzó entonces un primer ataque, que destruyó un vehículo y logró romper el convoy, que se dispersó. Un grupo de unos 20 vehículos continuó "a gran velocidad en dirección sur" y seguía planteando una "amenaza significativa", por lo que otra unidad aérea de la OTAN le atacó.
"En el momento del ataque, la Alianza Atlántica no sabía que Gadafi estaba en el convoy", explica la organización atlántica en un comunicado, subrayando que la intervención se llevó a cabo "únicamente para reducir la amenaza contra la población civil, tal y como se requiere hacer bajo el mandato de la ONU".
La OTAN indicó además que, como ha hecho durante todo el conflicto, no dirigió ninguno de sus ataques contra individuos en concreto. "Después supimos de distintas fuentes y de la Inteligencia aliada que Gadafi estaba en el convoy y que el ataque probablemente contribuyó a su captura", señala la nota.
Mientras, el comandante supremo de la OTAN en Europa, el general estadounidense James Stavridis, anunció que este viernes iba a proponer a los países de la Alianza el fin de la misión en Libia.
La OTAN concluirá su misión en Libia el 31 de octubre: La OTAN ha
acordado este miércoles concluir su misión en Libia el 31 de octubre
tras consultar con las Naciones Unidas y el Consejo Nacional de Transición (CNT) libio, según ha anunciado el secretario general aliado, Anders Fogh Rasmussen.En un comunicado, la Alianza Atlántica intentó aclarar su participación en los acontecimientos del jueves. Según explicó, sus aviones divisaron un grupo de unos 75 vehículos que abandonaba Sirte "a gran velocidad". Se trataba de un convoy que transportaba "una cantidad sustancial de armas y munición", lo que "planteaba una amenaza significativa para la población civil local".
La aviación aliada lanzó entonces un primer ataque, que destruyó un vehículo y logró romper el convoy, que se dispersó. Un grupo de unos 20 vehículos continuó "a gran velocidad en dirección sur" y seguía planteando una "amenaza significativa", por lo que otra unidad aérea de la OTAN le atacó.
"En el momento del ataque, la Alianza Atlántica no sabía que Gadafi estaba en el convoy", explica la organización atlántica en un comunicado, subrayando que la intervención se llevó a cabo "únicamente para reducir la amenaza contra la población civil, tal y como se requiere hacer bajo el mandato de la ONU".
La OTAN indicó además que, como ha hecho durante todo el conflicto, no dirigió ninguno de sus ataques contra individuos en concreto. "Después supimos de distintas fuentes y de la Inteligencia aliada que Gadafi estaba en el convoy y que el ataque probablemente contribuyó a su captura", señala la nota.
Mientras, el comandante supremo de la OTAN en Europa, el general estadounidense James Stavridis, anunció que este viernes iba a proponer a los países de la Alianza el fin de la misión en Libia.
Los embajadores de los países aliados acordaron de forma preliminar concluir las operaciones ese día, y "tomaremos la decisión definitiva a comienzos de la próxima semana" después de mantener consultas con la ONU y el CNT, ha dicho Rasmussen en una rueda de prensa. Hasta finales de mes, la Alianza Atlántica reducirá progresivamente las capacidades de su misión, si bien seguirá controlando la situación y con medios "para responder a las amenazas a los civiles si fuera necesario", añadió.
El anuncio se produjo después de una disputada reunión -sólo un día después de la muerte del dictador libio Muamar Gadafi- y en la que las diferencias entre los aliados hicieron que el acuerdo llegara cuatro horas más tarde de lo previsto.
El comandante supremo de la OTAN en Europa, el general estadounidense James Stavridis, había anunciado antes del inicio de la reunión que iba a proponer a los países de la Alianza el fin de la misión militar en Libia.
Sin embargo, en la reunión hubo distintas posturas entre los aliados: desde los que apoyaban concluir ya la misión hasta los que pedían continuar un tiempo más hasta que la situación en Libia se haya estabilizado.
Una operación legítima
Rasmussen ha restado importancia a estas diferencias y ha recalcado que las decisiones de la OTAN se toman por consenso entre todos sus miembros.
El secretario general ha destacado que el ataque de dos aviones de la OTAN ayer contra el convoy en el que viajaba Gadafi cerca de la ciudad de Sirte, y que propició su muerte y captura, fue "una operación legítima" dentro del mandato que la ONU dio a la organización.
Preguntado acerca de la muerte de Gadafi a manos de los rebeldes libios, Rasmussen ha mostrado su esperanza en que "la nuevas autoridades de Libia asuman totalmente los principios básicos del Estado de derecho, respeto a los derechos humanos y completa transparencia"
El secretario general ha destacado que el ataque de dos aviones de la OTAN ayer contra el convoy en el que viajaba Gadafi cerca de la ciudad de Sirte, y que propició su muerte y captura, fue "una operación legítima" dentro del mandato que la ONU dio a la organización.
Preguntado acerca de la muerte de Gadafi a manos de los rebeldes libios, Rasmussen ha mostrado su esperanza en que "la nuevas autoridades de Libia asuman totalmente los principios básicos del Estado de derecho, respeto a los derechos humanos y completa transparencia"
Fuente: "El mundo"
El lichamiento de Muammar Gaddafi. por Thierry Meyssan
La
muerte de Muammar al-Gaddafi ha sido celebrada con suma alegría en los
palacios presidenciales occidentales, esa misma alegría ha estado
ausente en la mayoría del pueblo libio. Para Thierry Meyssan, este
asesinato militarmente inútil ha sido perpetrado por el Imperio no
solamente como ejemplo, sino también para desestructurar la sociedad
tribal libia.
Durante 42 años, Mouammar Gaddafi ha protegido su país del colonialismo occidental. Hoy, él ha pasado a formar parte, junto con Omar al-Mokhtar (ver film histórico), en el panteón de los héroes nacionales libios.
_________________________________________
Jueves, 20 de octubre 2011, a 13h30 GMT, el Consejo Nacional de Transición (CNT) de Libia anunció la muerte de Muammar el-Gaddafi. A pesar de las gran confusión inicial, los primeros elementos sugieren que una caravana de coches intentaban salir de la ciudad de Sirte, ciudad sitiada, en donde la caravana fue bloqueada o en parte destruida por los bombardeos de la OTAN. Los sobrevivientes de esta caravana, dicen, se refugiaron entonces en las tuberías de una canalización. Gaddafi, que habría resultado herido, fue entonces capturado por la brigada Tigre de la tribu de los Misrata que habría aprovechado la ocasión para lincharlo.
El cuerpo del «Guía» de la Gran Jamahiriya Árabe Socialista no fue autorizado a que sea conservado en su ciudad natal de Sirte, o transportado a Trípoli, la capital, para su entierro, el cuerpo ha sido enviado como un trofeo de guerra por los Misrata a la ciudad del mismo nombre.
La tribu de los Misrata, que durante bastante tiempo dudó que campo escoger [el de los rebeldes o el de Gaddafi] y que en la actualidad prácticamente no tiene representante dentro del CNT, habrá dado finalmente el asalto de Trípoli después del bombardeo de la OTAN, y habrá linchado a Muammar el-Gaddafi tras el bombardeo de su caravana por la OTAN. E incluso ha trasladado el cuerpo del «Guía» a su ciudad para celebrar su triunfo. En julio, el «Guía» habría maldecido a los Misrata, instándolos de partir hacia Estambul y Tel Aviv, refiriéndose al hecho de que su tribu proviene de judíos turcos inmigrantes que se convirtieron al Islam.
Una avalancha de comentarios preparados bien de antemano han sido lanzados masivamente en todos los medios comerciales atlantistas con finalidad de demonizar una vez más a Gaddafi, y por lo tanto, hacer olvidar las condiciones bárbaras de su linchamiento y muerte.
Los principales dirigentes de la Coalición [de la OTAN] han celebrado jubilosamente la muerte de su enemigo y dicen estos que marca el acto final de la operación «Protector Unificado». Al hacerlo, ellos admiten implícitamente que dicha operación no tenía como finalidad hacer respetar y aplicar la Resolución 1973 del Consejo de Seguridad de la ONU, sino que tenía más bien como finalidad la de derribar un sistema político y la de matar a un líder, es decir al presidente de una nación, y esto a pesar que el asesinato de un jefe de estado en función está prohibido por la ley [jurisprudencia] de EE.UU. y condenado universalmente.
Además, el linchamiento de Muammar el Gadafi, demuestra la voluntad de la OTAN de no querer llevarlo ante la Corte Penal Internacional para juzgarlo simplemente porque no hubiera sido capaz de condenarlo por crímenes contra la humanidad a falta de pruebas fehacientes, de la misma manera que el Tribunal Penal Internacional para la ex Yugoslavia no pudo demostrar la culpabilidad de Slobodan Milosevic, a pesar de dos años de proceso.
En el torrente de barro y de calumnias vertidas por los medios de comunicación comercial atlantistas para ensuciar el legado y la memoria de Gaddafi, las mentiras y falsas acusaciones son repetidas constantemente, lo que demuestra a contrario que estos medios de comunicación tienen en realidad pocos elementos que sean auténticos y que pudiesen ser utilizados en contra de Gaddafi.
Así llega el caso del atentado contra la discoteca La Belle en Berlín (5 de abril de 1986, tres muertos, era en esa entonces la RFA República Federal de Alemania), suceso que fue utilizado como pretexto por la administración Reagan para bombardear su palacio y matar a su hija (14 de abril de 1986, por lo menos 50 muertos). En esa entonces, el fiscal alemán Detlev Mehlis (el mismo fiscal alemán que veinte años más tarde lo vamos a encontrar a cargo de la investigación del asesinato del primer ministro libanés Rafik al-Hariri y la falsificación de esta investigación) se basó en el testimonio de Eter Mushad para acusar a un diplomático libio y su cómplice Mohammed Amair. Sin embargo, la televisión alemana ZDF descubrió más tarde que Mushad Eter era un testigo falso y más bien un verdadero agente de la CIA, mientras que el atacante Mahammed Aamir era un agente del Mossad [1].
O el caso del atentado de Lockerbie (21 de diciembre de 1988, 270 muertes): los investigadores identificaron al dueño de la maleta que contenía la bomba y el sistema relojero para activar el explosivo gracias al testimonio de un comerciante maltés que había vendido un pantalón, pantalón que fue encontrado en la misma maleta-bomba. La justicia escocesa acusó entonces a dos agentes libios Abdelbasset Ali Mohmed Al Megrahi y Al Amin Khalifa Fhimah y el Consejo de Seguridad de la ONU tomó las sanciones contra Libia.
En última instancia, para poner fin a las sanciones, Libia accedió extraditar a los dos agentes (el primero fue condenado a cadena perpetua, el segundo fue absuelto) y a pagar $ 2.7 mil millones en compensación, mientras que el acusado prisionero continua proclamando su inocencia hasta hoy día.
En definitiva, en agosto de 2005, uno de los responsables escoceses encargado de la investigación declaró que la principal prueba, el sistema auto-disparador (temporizador o sistema relojero desencadenando la bomba) había sido colocado en el lugar del accidente por un agente de la CIA.
Más tarde, el mismo experto que había analizado el temporizador (relojero) para el tribunal admitió que él mismo había fabricado ese aparato antes que la CIA lo ponga sobre el lugar del accidente [donde cayeron los restos del avión]. Finalmente, el comerciante y vendedor de pantalones de Malta admitió haber recibido 2 millones de dólares para dar un falso testimonio. Las autoridades escocesas decidieron revisar el caso y el proceso, pero la salud de Abdel Basset Ali Mohmed Al Megrahi no lo permitió.
La actual campaña de desinformación [sobre Libia y Gaddafi] incluye también un aspecto sobre el estilo de vida del reciente difunto. Se le describe como un faraón con su suntuoso y lujoso modo de vida, de su astronómica fortuna oculta. Pero todos aquellos que conocieron de cerca a Muammar el Gadafi, o simplemente aquellos que han visitado su casa de familia y su residencia después de los bombardeos pueden dar fe de que él vivía en un ambiente similar al de la burguesía de su país, lejos de la ostentación jet-set de su ministro de Planificación, Mahmoud Jibril.
Del mismo modo, ninguno de los países que siguen investigando el paradero de la fortuna oculta de Gadafi, busqueda que se ha prolongado durante meses, ha sido capaz de encontrar esto. Todo el material y sumas incautadas pertenecían al gobierno libio y no al «Guía».
Al contrario, los medios de comunicación comerciales atlantistas sólo mencionan la orden de arresto internacional emitida por Interpol contra Muammar el-Gaddafi antes que comience la ofensiva de la OTAN sobre Libia.
Pero estos mismos medios de comunicación no dicen nada de la acusación de la justicia libanesa contra Gaddafi por haber eliminado al imán Musa Sadr y sus compañeros (en 1978). Esta omisión se debe al hecho de que el secuestro fue patrocinado por los Estados Unidos que quería eliminar a este imán chiíta antes de dejar que el ayatolá Ruhollah Jomeini regrese a Irán, por miedo a que Sadr no extienda por el Líbano la influencia de la revolución iraní.
Los medios de comunicación atlantistas no mencionan las críticas formuladas por la Resistencia civil anti-imperialista libanesa y las que también hicimos nosotros contra Muammar el-Gaddafi: sus compromisos oportunistas con Israel.
Por mi parte, puedo asegurar que, hasta la batalla de Trípoli, el «Guía» negoció con los enviados de Israel, con la esperanza de poder comprar la protección de Tel Aviv.
También debo testimoniar que, a pesar de mis críticas a su política internacional, y a pesar del expediente completo acerca de mí que la DCRI (rama de los servicios secretos franceses) le había proporcionado amablemente en julio en un intento para que me arrestaran, Muammar el Gadafi, me dió su confianza y me pidió que ayudara a su país para hacer valer sus derechos ante las Naciones Unidas [2], un comportamiento que no refleja la de un tirano abyecto.
Los medios de comunicación comerciales atlantistas no mencionaron tampoco las injerencias de Libia en la vida política francesa, ingerencia de Libia que yo condené, sobre todo acerca del financiamiento ilegal de la campaña electoral presidencial de Nicolas Sarkozy y de Ségolène Royal. El «Guía» había autorizado a su cuñado Abdallah Senoussi para que corrompa a los dos principales candidatos presidenciales franceses a cambio de la promesa de darle una amnistía o de ejercer presión sobre la justicia francesa para que cierren su expediente penal. [3]
Pero sobre todo, los medios de comunicación atlantistas nunca mencionaron el principal trabajo del «Guía»: el derrocamiento de una monarquía títere impuesta por los anglosajones, la expulsión de las tropas extranjeras estacionadas en Libia, la nacionalización de los hidrocarburos, la construcción del Man Made River (el sistema de irrigación más importante en el mundo), la redistribución de las ganancias del petróleo dentro de la población (que hizo que una de las poblaciones más pobres del mundo sea la más rica de África), el asilo generoso a los refugiados palestinos y la ayuda al desarrollo sin precedentes en el Tercer Mundo (la ayuda de Libia al desarrollo era más importante que la toda la ayuda reunida de los países del G-20).
La muerte de Muammar el Gadafi, no va a cambiar nada en el plano internacional. El acontecimiento más importante fue la caída de Trípoli, ciudad bombardeada masivamente y conquistada por la OTAN —sin duda el peor crimen de guerra en este siglo—, seguido de la entrada de la tribu de los Misrata para controlar la capital [y la masacre de inocentes].
Semanas antes que comience la batalla de Trípoli, la gran mayoría de los ciudadanos libios participaron, viernes tras viernes, en masivas manifestaciones contra la OTAN, contra el CNT y a favor de Gaddafi.
Ahora el país está destruido y están gobernados por la OTAN y sus títeres fantoches del CNT.
La muerte del «Guía» tendrá por otro lado un efecto traumático y durable en la sociedad libia. Matando con sus sicarios al líder del país, la OTAN ha destruido la esencia misma del principio de autoridad. Será necesario muchos años y mucha violencia antes que un nuevo líder pueda surgir y sea reconocido por el conjunto de las tribus, o que el sistema tribal sea remplazado por otro modo de organización social.
En este sentido, la muerte de Muammar el Gadafi, abre un período de incertidumbre y desestabilización para el país, país que puede ir camino a una iraquización o somalización de su territorio [en referencia a Irak y Somalia dos estados fallidos en la actualidad].
Fuente: "Red Voltaire"
_________________________________________
Jueves, 20 de octubre 2011, a 13h30 GMT, el Consejo Nacional de Transición (CNT) de Libia anunció la muerte de Muammar el-Gaddafi. A pesar de las gran confusión inicial, los primeros elementos sugieren que una caravana de coches intentaban salir de la ciudad de Sirte, ciudad sitiada, en donde la caravana fue bloqueada o en parte destruida por los bombardeos de la OTAN. Los sobrevivientes de esta caravana, dicen, se refugiaron entonces en las tuberías de una canalización. Gaddafi, que habría resultado herido, fue entonces capturado por la brigada Tigre de la tribu de los Misrata que habría aprovechado la ocasión para lincharlo.
El cuerpo del «Guía» de la Gran Jamahiriya Árabe Socialista no fue autorizado a que sea conservado en su ciudad natal de Sirte, o transportado a Trípoli, la capital, para su entierro, el cuerpo ha sido enviado como un trofeo de guerra por los Misrata a la ciudad del mismo nombre.
La tribu de los Misrata, que durante bastante tiempo dudó que campo escoger [el de los rebeldes o el de Gaddafi] y que en la actualidad prácticamente no tiene representante dentro del CNT, habrá dado finalmente el asalto de Trípoli después del bombardeo de la OTAN, y habrá linchado a Muammar el-Gaddafi tras el bombardeo de su caravana por la OTAN. E incluso ha trasladado el cuerpo del «Guía» a su ciudad para celebrar su triunfo. En julio, el «Guía» habría maldecido a los Misrata, instándolos de partir hacia Estambul y Tel Aviv, refiriéndose al hecho de que su tribu proviene de judíos turcos inmigrantes que se convirtieron al Islam.
Una avalancha de comentarios preparados bien de antemano han sido lanzados masivamente en todos los medios comerciales atlantistas con finalidad de demonizar una vez más a Gaddafi, y por lo tanto, hacer olvidar las condiciones bárbaras de su linchamiento y muerte.
Los principales dirigentes de la Coalición [de la OTAN] han celebrado jubilosamente la muerte de su enemigo y dicen estos que marca el acto final de la operación «Protector Unificado». Al hacerlo, ellos admiten implícitamente que dicha operación no tenía como finalidad hacer respetar y aplicar la Resolución 1973 del Consejo de Seguridad de la ONU, sino que tenía más bien como finalidad la de derribar un sistema político y la de matar a un líder, es decir al presidente de una nación, y esto a pesar que el asesinato de un jefe de estado en función está prohibido por la ley [jurisprudencia] de EE.UU. y condenado universalmente.
Además, el linchamiento de Muammar el Gadafi, demuestra la voluntad de la OTAN de no querer llevarlo ante la Corte Penal Internacional para juzgarlo simplemente porque no hubiera sido capaz de condenarlo por crímenes contra la humanidad a falta de pruebas fehacientes, de la misma manera que el Tribunal Penal Internacional para la ex Yugoslavia no pudo demostrar la culpabilidad de Slobodan Milosevic, a pesar de dos años de proceso.
En el torrente de barro y de calumnias vertidas por los medios de comunicación comercial atlantistas para ensuciar el legado y la memoria de Gaddafi, las mentiras y falsas acusaciones son repetidas constantemente, lo que demuestra a contrario que estos medios de comunicación tienen en realidad pocos elementos que sean auténticos y que pudiesen ser utilizados en contra de Gaddafi.
Así llega el caso del atentado contra la discoteca La Belle en Berlín (5 de abril de 1986, tres muertos, era en esa entonces la RFA República Federal de Alemania), suceso que fue utilizado como pretexto por la administración Reagan para bombardear su palacio y matar a su hija (14 de abril de 1986, por lo menos 50 muertos). En esa entonces, el fiscal alemán Detlev Mehlis (el mismo fiscal alemán que veinte años más tarde lo vamos a encontrar a cargo de la investigación del asesinato del primer ministro libanés Rafik al-Hariri y la falsificación de esta investigación) se basó en el testimonio de Eter Mushad para acusar a un diplomático libio y su cómplice Mohammed Amair. Sin embargo, la televisión alemana ZDF descubrió más tarde que Mushad Eter era un testigo falso y más bien un verdadero agente de la CIA, mientras que el atacante Mahammed Aamir era un agente del Mossad [1].
O el caso del atentado de Lockerbie (21 de diciembre de 1988, 270 muertes): los investigadores identificaron al dueño de la maleta que contenía la bomba y el sistema relojero para activar el explosivo gracias al testimonio de un comerciante maltés que había vendido un pantalón, pantalón que fue encontrado en la misma maleta-bomba. La justicia escocesa acusó entonces a dos agentes libios Abdelbasset Ali Mohmed Al Megrahi y Al Amin Khalifa Fhimah y el Consejo de Seguridad de la ONU tomó las sanciones contra Libia.
En última instancia, para poner fin a las sanciones, Libia accedió extraditar a los dos agentes (el primero fue condenado a cadena perpetua, el segundo fue absuelto) y a pagar $ 2.7 mil millones en compensación, mientras que el acusado prisionero continua proclamando su inocencia hasta hoy día.
En definitiva, en agosto de 2005, uno de los responsables escoceses encargado de la investigación declaró que la principal prueba, el sistema auto-disparador (temporizador o sistema relojero desencadenando la bomba) había sido colocado en el lugar del accidente por un agente de la CIA.
Más tarde, el mismo experto que había analizado el temporizador (relojero) para el tribunal admitió que él mismo había fabricado ese aparato antes que la CIA lo ponga sobre el lugar del accidente [donde cayeron los restos del avión]. Finalmente, el comerciante y vendedor de pantalones de Malta admitió haber recibido 2 millones de dólares para dar un falso testimonio. Las autoridades escocesas decidieron revisar el caso y el proceso, pero la salud de Abdel Basset Ali Mohmed Al Megrahi no lo permitió.
La actual campaña de desinformación [sobre Libia y Gaddafi] incluye también un aspecto sobre el estilo de vida del reciente difunto. Se le describe como un faraón con su suntuoso y lujoso modo de vida, de su astronómica fortuna oculta. Pero todos aquellos que conocieron de cerca a Muammar el Gadafi, o simplemente aquellos que han visitado su casa de familia y su residencia después de los bombardeos pueden dar fe de que él vivía en un ambiente similar al de la burguesía de su país, lejos de la ostentación jet-set de su ministro de Planificación, Mahmoud Jibril.
Del mismo modo, ninguno de los países que siguen investigando el paradero de la fortuna oculta de Gadafi, busqueda que se ha prolongado durante meses, ha sido capaz de encontrar esto. Todo el material y sumas incautadas pertenecían al gobierno libio y no al «Guía».
Al contrario, los medios de comunicación comerciales atlantistas sólo mencionan la orden de arresto internacional emitida por Interpol contra Muammar el-Gaddafi antes que comience la ofensiva de la OTAN sobre Libia.
Pero estos mismos medios de comunicación no dicen nada de la acusación de la justicia libanesa contra Gaddafi por haber eliminado al imán Musa Sadr y sus compañeros (en 1978). Esta omisión se debe al hecho de que el secuestro fue patrocinado por los Estados Unidos que quería eliminar a este imán chiíta antes de dejar que el ayatolá Ruhollah Jomeini regrese a Irán, por miedo a que Sadr no extienda por el Líbano la influencia de la revolución iraní.
Los medios de comunicación atlantistas no mencionan las críticas formuladas por la Resistencia civil anti-imperialista libanesa y las que también hicimos nosotros contra Muammar el-Gaddafi: sus compromisos oportunistas con Israel.
Por mi parte, puedo asegurar que, hasta la batalla de Trípoli, el «Guía» negoció con los enviados de Israel, con la esperanza de poder comprar la protección de Tel Aviv.
También debo testimoniar que, a pesar de mis críticas a su política internacional, y a pesar del expediente completo acerca de mí que la DCRI (rama de los servicios secretos franceses) le había proporcionado amablemente en julio en un intento para que me arrestaran, Muammar el Gadafi, me dió su confianza y me pidió que ayudara a su país para hacer valer sus derechos ante las Naciones Unidas [2], un comportamiento que no refleja la de un tirano abyecto.
Los medios de comunicación comerciales atlantistas no mencionaron tampoco las injerencias de Libia en la vida política francesa, ingerencia de Libia que yo condené, sobre todo acerca del financiamiento ilegal de la campaña electoral presidencial de Nicolas Sarkozy y de Ségolène Royal. El «Guía» había autorizado a su cuñado Abdallah Senoussi para que corrompa a los dos principales candidatos presidenciales franceses a cambio de la promesa de darle una amnistía o de ejercer presión sobre la justicia francesa para que cierren su expediente penal. [3]
Pero sobre todo, los medios de comunicación atlantistas nunca mencionaron el principal trabajo del «Guía»: el derrocamiento de una monarquía títere impuesta por los anglosajones, la expulsión de las tropas extranjeras estacionadas en Libia, la nacionalización de los hidrocarburos, la construcción del Man Made River (el sistema de irrigación más importante en el mundo), la redistribución de las ganancias del petróleo dentro de la población (que hizo que una de las poblaciones más pobres del mundo sea la más rica de África), el asilo generoso a los refugiados palestinos y la ayuda al desarrollo sin precedentes en el Tercer Mundo (la ayuda de Libia al desarrollo era más importante que la toda la ayuda reunida de los países del G-20).
La muerte de Muammar el Gadafi, no va a cambiar nada en el plano internacional. El acontecimiento más importante fue la caída de Trípoli, ciudad bombardeada masivamente y conquistada por la OTAN —sin duda el peor crimen de guerra en este siglo—, seguido de la entrada de la tribu de los Misrata para controlar la capital [y la masacre de inocentes].
Semanas antes que comience la batalla de Trípoli, la gran mayoría de los ciudadanos libios participaron, viernes tras viernes, en masivas manifestaciones contra la OTAN, contra el CNT y a favor de Gaddafi.
Ahora el país está destruido y están gobernados por la OTAN y sus títeres fantoches del CNT.
La muerte del «Guía» tendrá por otro lado un efecto traumático y durable en la sociedad libia. Matando con sus sicarios al líder del país, la OTAN ha destruido la esencia misma del principio de autoridad. Será necesario muchos años y mucha violencia antes que un nuevo líder pueda surgir y sea reconocido por el conjunto de las tribus, o que el sistema tribal sea remplazado por otro modo de organización social.
En este sentido, la muerte de Muammar el Gadafi, abre un período de incertidumbre y desestabilización para el país, país que puede ir camino a una iraquización o somalización de su territorio [en referencia a Irak y Somalia dos estados fallidos en la actualidad].
Fuente: "Red Voltaire"
jueves, 20 de octubre de 2011
Walt Whitman (pequeños extractos).
A mi juicio, el mejor gobierno es el que deja a la gente en paz.
Lo más común, vulgar, próximo y simple, eso soy yo.
La vida es lo poco que nos sobra de la muerte.
Me celebro y me canto.
He aprendido que estar con aquello que me gusta es suficiente.
CARPE DIEM
WALT WHITMAN
Aprovecha el día.
No dejes que termine sin haber crecido un poco, sin haber sido feliz,
sin haber alimentado tus sueños.
No te dejes vencer por el desaliento. No permitas que nadie te quite el
derecho de expresarte, que es casi un deber.
No abandones tus ansias de hacer de tu vida algo extraordinario...
No dejes de creer que las palabras y la poesía, sí pueden cambiar al
mundo; porque, pase lo que pase, nuestra esencia está intacta.
Somos seres humanos llenos de pasión, la vida es desierto y es oasis.
Nos derriba, nos lastima, nos convierte en protagonistas de nuestra
propia historia.
Aunque el viento sople en contra, la poderosa obra continúa. Y tú
puedes aportar una estrofa...
No dejes nunca de soñar, porque sólo en sueños puede ser libre el
hombre.
No caigas en el peor de los errores: el silencio. La mayoría vive en un
silencio espantoso. No te resignes, huye...
"Yo emito mi alarido por los tejados de este mundo", dice el poeta;
valora la belleza de las cosas simples, se puede hacer poesía sobre las
pequeñas cosas.
No traiciones tus creencias, todos merecemos ser aceptados.
No podemos remar en contra de nosotros mismos, eso transforma la
vida en un infierno.
Disfruta del pánico que provoca tener la vida por delante.
Vívela intensamente, sin mediocridades.
Piensa que en ti está el futuro, y asume la tarea con orgullo y sin
miedo.
Aprende de quienes pueden enseñarte. Las experiencias de quienes se
alimentaron de nuestros "Poetas Muertos", te ayudarán a caminar por
la vida.
La sociedad de hoy somos nosotros, los "Poetas Vivos".
No permitas que la vida te pase a ti, sin que tú la vivas...
Walt Whitman
miércoles, 19 de octubre de 2011
Cosmic Consciousness: A Study in the Evolution of the Human Mind (1901) Richard Maurice Bucke
PART I.
FIRS T WORDS.
I.
WHAT is Cosmic Consciousness ?
The present volume is an attempt to answer this question ; but notwithstanding it seems well to make a short pref- atory statement in as plain language as possible so as to open the door, as it were, for the more elaborate exposition to be attempted in the body of the work. Cosmic Conciousness, then, is a higher form of consciousness than that possessed by the ordinary man. This last is called Self Consciousness and is that faculty upon which rests all of our life (both subjective and objec- tive) which is not common to us and the higher animals, except that small part of it which is derived from the few individuals who have had the higher consciousness above named. To make the matter clear it must be under- stood that there are three forms or grades of consciousness, (i) Simple Consciousness, which is possessed by say the upper half of the animal king- dom. By means of this faculty a dog or a horse is just as conscious of the things about him as a man is; he is also conscious of his own limbs and body and he knows that these are a part of himself. (2) Over and above this Simple Consciousness, which is possessed by man as by animals, man has another which is called Self Consciousness. By virtue of this faculty man is not only conscious of trees, rocks, waters, his own limbs and body, but he becomes conscious of himself as a distinct entity apart from all the rest of the universe. It is as good as certain that no animal can realize him- self in that way. Further, by means of self consciousness, man (who knows as the animal knows) becomes capable of treating his own mental states as objects of consciousness. The animal is, as it were, immersed in his con- sciousness as a fish in the sea; he cannot, even in imagination, get outside of it for one moment so as to realize it. But man by virtue of self conscious- ness can step aside, as it were, from himself and think: "Yes, that thought that I had about that matter is true; I know it is true and I know that I know it is true." The writer has been asked : "How do you know that ani- mals cannot think in the same manner?" The answer is simple and conclu- sive—it is: There is no evidence that any animal can so think, but if they could we should soon know it. Between two creatures living together, as dogs or horses and men, and each self conscious, it would be the simplest 2 Cosmic Consciousness matter in the world to open up communication. Even as it is, diverse as is our psychology, we do, by watching his acts, enter into the dog's mind pretty freely—we see what is going on there—we know that the dog sees and hears, smells and tastes—we know that he has intelligence—adapts means to ends —that he reasons. If he was self conscious we must have learned it long ago. We have not learned it and it is as good as certain that no dog, horse, elephant or ape ever was self conscious. Another thing : on man's self con- sciousness is built everything in and about us distinctively human. Lan guage is the objective of which self consciousness is the subjective. Self con sciousness and language (two in one, for they are two halves of the same thing) are the sine qua non of human social life, of manners, of institutions, of industries of all kinds, of all arts useful and fine. If any animal pos- sessed self consciousness it seems certain that it would upon that master fac- ulty build (as man has done) a superstructure of language; of reasoned out customs, industries, art. But no animal has done this, therefore we infer that no animal has self consciousness.
The possession of self consciousness and language (its other self) by man creates an enormous gap between him and the highest creature possessing simple consciousness merely.
Cosmic Consciousness is a third form which is as far above Self Con- sciousness as is that above Simple Consciousness. With this form, of course, both simple and self consciousness persist (as simple cosciousness persists when self consciousness is acquired), but added to them is the new faculty so often named and to be named in this volume. The prime characteristic of cosmic consciousness is, as its name implies, a consciousness of the cos- mos, that is, of the life and order of the universe. What these words mean cannot be touched upon here ; it is the business of this volume to throw some light upon them. There are many elements belonging to the cosmic sense besides the central fact just alluded to. Of these a few may be men- tioned. Along with the consciousness of the cosmos there occurs an intel- lectual enlightenment or illumination which alone would place the individual on a new plane of existence—would make him almost a member of a new species. To this is added a state of moral exaltation, an indescribable feel- ing of elevation, elation, and joyousness, and a quickening of the moral sense, which is fully as striking and more important both to the individual and to the race than is the enhanced intellectual power. With these come, what may be called, a sense of immortality, a consciousness of eternal life, not a conviction that he shall have this, but the consciousness that he has it already.
Only a personal experience of it, or a prolonged study of men who have First Words 3 passed into the new life, will enable us to realize what this actually is ; but it has seemed to the present writer that to pass in review, even briefly and imperfectly, instances in which the condition in question has existed would be worth while. He expects his work to be useful in two ways: First, in broadening the general view of human life by comprehending in our mental vision this important phase of it, and by enabling us to realize, in some measure, the true status of certain men who, down to the present, are either exalted, by the average self conscious individual, to the rank of gods, or, adopting the other extreme, are adjudged insane. And in the second place he hopes to furnish aid to his fellow men in a far more practical and impor- tant sense. The view he takes is that our descendants will sooner or later reach, as a race, the condition of cosmic consciousness, just as, long ago, our ancestors passed from simple to self consciousness. He believes that this step in evolution is even now being made, since it is clear to him both that men with the faculty in question are becoming more and more common and also that as a race we are approaching nearer and nearer to that stage of the self conscious mind from which the transition to the cosmic conscious is effected. He realizes that, granted the necessary heredity, any individual not already beyond the age may enter cosmic consciousness. He knows that intelligent contact with cosmic conscious minds assists self conscious indi- viduals in the ascent to the higher plane. He therefore hopes, by bringing about, or at least facilitating this contact, to aid men and women in making the almost infinitely important step in question.
II. The immediate future of our race, the writer thinks, is indescribably hope- ful. There are at the present moment impending over us three revolutions, the least of which would dwarf the ordinary historic upheaval called by that name into absolute insignificance. They are : (1) The material, economic and social revolution which will depend upon and result from the establish- ment of aerial navigation. (2) The economic and social revolution which will abolish individual ownership and rid the earth at once of two immense evils—riches and poverty. And (3) The psychical revolution of which there is here question.
Either of the first two would (and will) radically change the conditions of, and greatly uplift, human life ; but the third will do more for humanity than both of the former, were their importance multiplied by hundreds or even thousands.
4 Cosmi c Consciousnes s The three operating (as they will) together will literally create a new heaven and a new earth. Old things will be done away and all will become new. Before aerial navigation national boundaries, tariffs, and perhaps distinc- tions of language will fade out. Great cities will no longer have reason for being and will melt away. The men who now dwell in cities will inhabit in summer the mountains and the sea shores ; building often in airy and beau- tiful spots, now almost or quite inaccessible, commanding the most extensive and magnificent views. In the winter they will probably dwell in communi- ties of moderate size. As the herding together, as now, in great cities, so the isolation of the worker of the soil will become a thing of the past. Space will be practically annihilated, there will be no crowding together and no enforced solitude.
Before Socialism crushing toil, cruel anxiety, insulting and demoralizing riches, poverty and its ills will become subjects for historical novels. In contact with the flux of cosmic consciousness all religions known and named to-day will be melted down. The human soul will be revolutionized. Religion will absolutely dominate the race. It will not depend on tradition. It will not be believed and disbelieved. It will not be a part of life, belong- ing to certain hours, times, occasions. It will not be in sacred books nor in the mouths of priests. It will not dwell in churches and meetings and forms and days. Its life will not be in prayers, hymns nor discourses. It will not depend on special revelations, on the words of gods who came down to teach, nor on any bible or bibles. It will have no mission to save men from their sins or to secure them entrance to heaven. It will not teach a future immortality nor future glories, for immortality and all glory will exist in the here and now. The evidence of immortality will live in every heart as sight in every eye. Doubt of God and of eternal life will be as impossible as is now doubt of existence; the evidence of each will be the same. Religion will govern every minute of every day of all life. Churches, priests, forms, creeds, prayers, all agents, all intermediaries between the individual man and God will be permanently replaced by direct unmistakable intercourse. Sin will no longer exist nor will salvation be desired. Men will not worry about death or a future, about the kingdom of heaven, about what may come with and after the cessation of the life of the present body. Each soul will feel and know itself to be immortal, will feel and know that the entire universe with all its good and with all its beauty is for it and belongs to it forever. The world peopled by men possessing cosmic consciousness will be as far removed from the world of to-day as this is from the world as it was before the advent of self consciousness. First Words 5 III. There is a tradition, probably very old, to the effect that the first man was innocent and happy until he ate of the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. That having eaten thereof he became aware that he was naked and was ashamed. Further, that then sin was born into the world, the miserable sense whereof replaced man's former feeling of innocency. That then and not till then man began to labor and to cover his body. Stranger than all (so it seems to us), the story runs, that along with this change or immediately following upon it there came into man's mind the remarkable conviction which has never since left it but which has been kept alive by its own inherent vitality and by the teaching of all true seers, prophets and poets that this accursed thing which has bitten man's heel (laming him, hin- dering his progress and especially making this halting and painful) should eventually be crushed and subjugated by man himself—by the rising up within him of a Saviour—the Christ.
Man's progenitor was a creature (an animal) walking erect but with sim- ple consciousness merely. He was (as are to-day the animals) incapable of sin or of the feeling of sin and equally incapable of shame (at least in the human sense). He had no feeling or knowledge of good and evil. He as yet knew nothing of what we call work and had never labored. From this state he fell (or rose) into self consciousness, his eyes were opened, he knew that he was naked, he felt shame, acquired the sense of sin (became in fact what is called a sinner), and learned to do certain things in order to encom- pass certain ends—that is, he learned to labor.
For weary eons this condition has lasted—the sense of sin still haunts his pathway—by the sweat of his brow he still eats bread—he is still ashamed. Where is the deliverer, the Saviour ? Who or what ?
The Saviour of man is Cosmic Consciousness—in Paul's language—the Christ. The cosmic sense (in whatever mind it appears) crushes the ser- pent's head—destroys sin, shame, the sense of good and evil as contrasted one with the other, and will annihilate labor, though not human activity.
The fact that there came to man along with or immediately after his acqui- sition of self consciousness the inchoate premonition of another and higher consciousness which was yet, at that time, many milleniums in the future is surely most noteworthy though not necessarily surprising. We have in biology many analogous facts such as premonition of, and preparation for, by the individual of states and circumstances of which he has had no experience and we see the same thing in the maternal instinct in the very young girl.
6 Cosmic Consciousness Th e universal scheme is woven in one piece and is permeable to con- sciousness or (and especially) to sub-consciousness throughout and in every direction. The universe is a vast, grandiose, terrible, multiform yet uni- form evolution. The section which especially concerns us is that which extends from brute to man, from man to demigod, and constitutes the im- posing drama of humanity—its scene the surface of the planet—its time a million years. IV. The purpose of these preliminary remarks is to throw as much light as possible on the subject of this volume, so as to increase the pleasure and profit of its perusal. A personal exposition of the writer's own introduction to the main fact treated of will perhaps do as much as anything else could to further this end. He will therefore frankly set down here a very brief outline of his early mental life and give a short account of his slight experience of what he calls cosmic consciousness. The reader will readily see therefrom whence came the ideas and convictions presented in the following pages. He was born of good middle class English stock and grew up almost without education on what was then a backwoods Canadian farm. As a child he assisted in such labor as lay within his power. Tended cattle, horses, sheep, pigs ; brought in firewood, worked in the hay field, drove oxen and horses, ran errands. His pleasures were as simple as his labors. An occa- sional visit to a neighboring small town, a game of ball, bathing in the creek that ran through his father's farm, the making and sailing of mimic ships, the search for birds' eggs and flowers in the spring, and for wild fruits in the summer and fall, afforded him, with his skates and handsled in the winter, his homely, much loved recreations. While still a young boy he read with keen appreciation Marryat's novels, Scott's poems and novels, and other similar books dealing with outdoor nature and human life. He never, even as a child, accepted the doctrines of the Christian church ; but, as soon as old enough to dwell at all on such themes, conceived that Jesus was a man— great and good no doubt, but a man. That no one would ever be con- demned to everlasting pain. That if a conscious God existed he was the supreme master and meant well in the end to all ; but that, this visible life here being ended, it was doubtful, or more than doubtful, whether conscious identity would be preserved. The boy (even the child) dwelt on these and similar topics far more than anyone would suppose ; but probably not more than many other introspective small fellow mortals. He was subject at times to a sort of ecstasy of curiosity and hope. As on one special occasion when about ten years old he earnestly longed to die that the secrets of the beyond, First Words 7 if there was any beyond, might be revealed to him ; also to agonies of anxiety and terror, as for instance, at about the same age he read Reynold's "Faust," and, being near its end one sunny afternoon, he laid it down utterly unable to continue its perusal, and went out into the sunshine to recover from the horror (after more than fifty years he distinctly recalls it) which had seized him. The boy's mother died when he was only a few years old, and his father shortly afterwards. The outward circumstances of his life in some respects became more unhappy than can readily be told. At sixteen the boy left home to live or die as might happen. For five years he wandered over North Amer- ica from the great Lakes to the Gulf of Mexico and from the Upper Ohio to San Francisco. He worked on farms, on railways, on steamboats, and in the placer diggings of Western Nevada. Several times he nearly suffered ship- wreck by sickness, starvation, freezing, and once on the banks of the Hum- boldt River, in Utah, fought for his life half a day with the Shoshone Indians. After five years' wandering, at the age of twenty-one, he returned to the country where his childhood had been passed. A moderate sum of money from his dead mother enabled him to spend some years in study, and his mind, after lying so long fallow, absorbed ideas with extraordinary facility. He graduated with high honors four years after his return from the Pacific Coast. Outside of the collegiate course he read with avidity many speculative books, such as the " Origin of Species," Tyndall's " Heat" and " Essays, " Buckle's " History," " Essays and Reviews," and much poetry, especially such as seemed to him free and fearless. In this species of literature he soon pre- ferred Shelley, and of his poems, "Adonias" and "Prometheus" were his favorites. His life for some years was one passionate note of interrogation, an unappeasable hunger for enlightenment on the basic problems. Leaving college, he continued his search with the same ardor. Taught himself French that he might read Auguste Comte, Hugo and Renan, and German that he might read Goethe, especially "Faust." At the age of thirty he fell in with " Leaves of Grass," and at once saw that it contained, in greater measure than any book so far found, what he had so long been looking for. He read the " Leaves " eagerly, even passionately, but for several years derived little from them. At last light broke and there was revealed to him (as far per- haps as such things can be revealed) at least some of the meanings. Then occurred that to which the foregoing is preface. It was in the early spring, at the beginning of his thirty-sixth year. He and two friends had spent the evening reading Wordsworth, Shelley, Keats, Browning, and especially Whitman. They parted at midnight, and he had a long drive in a hansom (it was in an English city). His mind, deeply 8 Cosmic Consciousness under the influence of the ideas, images and emotions called up by the reading and talk of the evening, was calm and peaceful. He was in a state of quiet, almost passive enjoyment. All at once, without warning of any kind, he found himself wrapped around as it were by a flame-colored cloud. For an instant he thought of fire, some sudden conflagration in the great city; the next he knew that the light was within himself. Directly after- wards came upon him a sense of exultation, of immense joyousness accom- panied or immediately followed by an intellectual illumination quite impos- sible to describe. Into his brain streamed one momentary lightning-flash of the Brahmic Splendor which has ever since lightened his life; upon his heart fell one drop of Brahmic Bliss, leaving thenceforward for always an after taste of heaven. Among other things he did not come to believe, he saw and knew that the Cosmos is not dead matter but a living Presence, that the soul of man is immortal, that the universe is so built and ordered that without any peradventure all things work together for the good of each and all, that the foundation principle of the world is what we call love and that the happiness of every one is in the long run absolutely certain. He claims that he learned more within the few seconds during which the illumi- nation lasted than in previous months or even years of study, and that he learned much that no study could ever have taught. The illumination itself continued not more than a few moments, but its effects proved ineffaceable ; it was impossible for him ever to forget what he at that time saw and knew; neither did he, or could he, ever doubt the truth of what was then presented to his mind. There was no return that night or at any other time of the experience. He subsequently wrote a book (28a.) in which he sought to embody the teaching of the illumination. Some who read it thought very highly of it, but (as was to be expected for many reasons) it had little circulation. The supreme occurrence of that night was his real and sole initiation to the new and higher order of ideas. But it was only an initiation. He saw the light but had no more idea whence it came and what it meant than had the first creature that saw the light of the sun. Years afterwards he met C. P., of whom he had often heard as having extraordinary spiritual insight. He found that C. P. had entered the higher life of which he had had a glimpse and had had a large experience of its phenomena. His conversa- tion with C. P. threw a flood of light upon the true meaning of what he had himself experienced. Looking round then upon the world of man, he saw the significance of the subjective light in the case of Paul and in that of Mohammed. The secret First Words 9 of Whitman's transcendent greatness was revealed to him. Certain conver- sations with J. H. J. and with J. B. helped him not a little. Personal inter- course with Edward Carpenter, T. S. R., C. M. C. and M. C. L. assisted greatly in the broadening and clearing up of his speculations, in the extension and co-ordination of his thought. But much time and labor were still required before the germinal concept could be satisfactorily elaborated and matured, the idea, namely, that there exists a family sprung from, living among, but scarcely forming a part of ordinary humanity, whose members are spread abroad throughout the advanced races of mankind and throughout the last forty centuries of the world's history. The trait that distinguishes these people from other men is this: Their spiritual eyes have been opened and they have seen. The better known members of this group who, were they collected together, could be accomo- dated all at one time in a modern drawing-room, have created all the great modern religions, beginning with Taoism and Buddhism, and speaking gen- erally have created, through religion and literature, modern civilization. Not that they have contributed any large numerical proportion of the books which have been written, but that they have produced the few books which have inspired the larger number of all that have been written in modern times. These men dominate the last twenty-five, especially the last five, centuries as stars of the first magnitude dominate the midnight sky. A man is identified as a member of this family by the fact that at a certain age he has passed through a new birth and risen to a higher spiritual plane. The reality of the new birth is demonstrated by the subjective light and other phenomena. The object of the present volume is to teach others what little the writer himself has been able to learn of the spiritual status of this new race. V. It remains to say a few words upon the psychological origin of what is called in this book Cosmic Consciousness, which must not be looked upon as being in any sense supernatural or supranormal—as anything more or less than a natural growth. Although in the birth of Cosmic Consciousness the moral nature plays an important part, it will be better for many reasons to confine our attention at present to the evolution of the intellect. In this evolution there are four distinct steps. The first of them was taken when upon the primary quality of excitability sensation was established. At this point began the acquisition and more or less perfect registration of sense impressions—that is, of percepts. 10 Cosmic Consciousness A percept is of course a sense impression—a sound is heard or an object seen and the impression made is a percept. If we could go back far enough we should find among our ancestors a creature whose whole intellect was made up simply of these percepts. But this creature (whatever name it ought to bear) had in it what may be called an eligibility of growth, and what happened with it was something like this: Individually and from generation to generation it accumulated these percepts, the constant repetition of which, calling for further and further registration, led, in the struggle for existence and, under the law of natural selection, to an accumulation of cells in the cen- tral sense ganglia; the multiplication of cells made further registration pos- sible ; that, again, made further growth of the ganglia necessary, and so on. At last a condition was reached in which it became possible for our ancestor to combine groups of these percepts into what we to-day call a recept. This process is very similar to that of composite photography. Similar percepts (as of a tree) are registered one over the other until (the nerve center having become competent to the task) they are generalized into, as it were, one per- cept ; but that compound percept is neither more nor less than a recept—a something that has been received. Now the work of accumulation begins again on a higher plane: the sensory organs keep steadily at work manufacturing percepts; the receptual centers keep steadily at work manufacturing more and yet more recepts from the old and the new percepts; the capacities of the central ganglia are con- stantly taxed to do the necessary registration of percepts, the necessary elab- oration of these into recepts and the necessary registration of recepts; then as the ganglia by use and selection are improved they constantly manufacture from percepts and from the initial simple recepts, more and more complex, that is, higher and higher recepts. At last, after many thousands of generations have lived and died, comes a time when the mind of the animal we are considering has reached the highest possible point of purely receptual intelligence ; the accumulation of percepts and of recepts has gone on until no greater stores of impressions can be laid up and no further elaboration of these can be accomplished on the plane of receptual intelligence. Then another break is made and the higher recepts are replaced by concepts. The relation of a concept to a recept is somewhat similar to the relation of algebra to arithmetic. A recept is, as I have said, a composite image of hundreds, perhaps thousands, of percepts ; it is itself an image abstracted from many images ; but a concept is that same composite image—that same recept—named, ticketed, and, as it were, dismissed. A concept is in fact neither more nor less than a named First Word s 11 recept—the name, that is, the sign (as in algebra), standing henceforth for the thing itself, that is, for the recept. Now it is as clear as day to any one who will give the least thought to the subject, that the revolution by which concepts are substituted for recepts increases the efficiency of the brain for thought as much as the introduction of machinery increased the capacity of the race for work—or as much as the use of algebra increases the power of the mind in mathematical calcula- tions. To replace a great cumbersome recept by a simple sign was almost like replacing actual goods—as wheat, fabrics and hardware—by entries in the ledger. But, as hinted above, in order that a recept may be replaced by a concept it must be named, or, in other words, marked with a sign which stands for it —just as a check stands for a piece of baggage or as an entry in a ledger stands for a piece of goods ; in other words, the race that is in possession of concepts is also, and necessarily, in possession of language. Further, it should be noted, as the possession of concepts implies the possession of lan- guage, so the possession of concepts and language (which are in reality two aspects of the same thing) implies the possession of self consciousness. All this means that there is a moment in the evolution of mind when the re- ceptual intellect, capable of simple consciousness only, becomes almost or quite instantaneously a conceptual intellect in possession of language and self consciousness. When we say that an individual, whether an adult individual long ago or a child to-day does not matter, came into possession of concepts, of language and of self consciousness in an instant, we, of course, mean that the indi- vidual came into possession of self consciousness and of one or a few con- cepts and of one or a few true words instantaneously and not that he entered into possession of a whole language in that short time. In the history of the individual man the point in question is reached and passed at about the age of three years; in the history of the race it was reached and passed several hundred thousand years ago. We have now, in our analysis, reached the point where we each individ- ually stand, the point, namely, of the conceptual, self conscious mind. In acquiring this new and higher form of consciousness it must not for a moment be supposed that we have dropped either our receptual intelligence or our old perceptual mind ; as a matter of fact we could not live without these any more than could the animal who has no other mind than them. Our intellect, then, to-day is made up of a very complex mixture of percepts, recepts and concepts. 12 Cosmi c Consciousnes s Let us now for a moment consider the concept. This may be considered as a large and complex recept; but larger and more complex than any recept. It is made up of one or more recepts combined with probably sev- eral percepts. This extremely complex recept is then marked by a sign ; that is, jt is named and in virtue of its name it becomes a concept. The concept, after being named or marked, is (as it were) laid away, just as a piece of checked baggage is marked by its check and piled in the baggage-room. By means of this check we can send the trunk to any part of America without ever seeing it or knowing just where it is at a given moment. So by means of their signs we can build concepts into elaborate calculations, into poems and into systems of philosophy, without knowing half the time anything about the thing represented by the individual concepts that we are using. And here a remark must be made aside from the main argument. It has been noticed thousands of times that the brain of a thinking man does not exceed in size the brain of a non-thinking wild man in anything like the pro- portion in which the mind of the thinker exceeds the mind of the savage. The reason is that the brain of a Herbert Spencer has very little more work to do than has the brain of a native Australian, for this reason, that Spencer does all his characteristic mental work by signs or counters which stand for concepts, while the savage does all or nearly all his by means of cumbersome recepts. The savage is in a position comparable to that of the astronomer who makes his calculations by arithmetic, while Spencer is in the position of one who makes them by algebra. The first will fill many great sheets of paper with figures and go through immense labor; the other will make the same calculations on an envelope and with comparatively little mental work. The next chapter in the story is the accumulation of concepts. This is a double process. From the age, we will say, of three years each one accu- mulates year by year a larger and larger number, while at the same time the individual concepts are becoming constantly more and more complex. Con- sider for instance the concept science as it exists in the mind of a boy and of a middle aged thinking man ; with the former it stood for a few dozen or a few hundred facts; with the latter for many thousands. Is there to be any limit to this growth of concepts in number and com- plexity ? Whoever will seriously consider that question will see that there must be a limit. No such process could go on to infinity. Should nature attempt such a feat the brain would have to grow until it could no longer be fed and a condition of deadlock be reached which would forbid further progress. Firs t Word s 13 We have seen that the expansion of the perceptual mind had a necessary limit; that its own continued life led it inevitably up to and into the recep- tual mind. That the receptual mind by its own growth was inevitably led up to and into the conceptual mind. A priori considerations make it certain that a corresponding outlet will be found for the conceptual mind. But we do not need to depend on abstract reasoning to demonstrate the necessary existence of the supra conceptual mind, since it exists and can be studied with no more difficulty than other natural phenomena. The supra conceptual intellect, the elements of which instead of being concepts are intuitions, is already (in small numbers it is true) an established fact, and the form of consciousness that belongs to that intellect may be called and has been called—Cosmic Consciousness. Thus we have four distinct stages of intellect, all abundantly illustrated in the animal and human worlds about us—all equally illustrated in the indi- vidual growth of the cosmic conscious mind and all four existing together in that mind as the first three exist together in the ordinary human mind. These four stages are, first, the perceptual mind—the mind made up of per- cepts or sense impressions; second, the mind made up of these and recepts —the so called receptual mind, or in other words the mind of simple con- sciousness; third, we have the mind made up of percepts, recepts and con- cepts, called sometimes the conceptual mind or otherwise the self conscious mind—the mind of self consciousness; and, fourth, and last, we have the intuitional mind—the mind whose highest element is not a recept or a con- cept but an intuition. This is the mind in which sensation, simple conscious- ness and self consciousness are supplemented and crowned with cosmic consciousness. But it is necessary to show more clearly still the nature of these four stages and their relation one to the other. The perceptual or sensational stage of intellect is easy enough to understand, so may be passed by in this place with only one remark, namely, that in a mind made up wholly of per- cepts there is no consciousness of any sort. When, however, the receptual mind comes into existence simple consciousness is born, which means that animals are conscious (as we know they are) of the things they see about them. But the receptual mind is capable of simple consciousness only— that is, the animal is conscious of the object which he sees, but he does not know he is conscious of it; neither is the animal conscious of itself as a dis- tinct entity or personality. In still other words, the animal cannot stand outside of itself and look at itself as any self conscious creature can. This, then, is simple consciousness: to be conscious of the things about one, but 14 Cosmic Consciousness not to be conscious of one's self. But when I have reached self consciousness I am not only conscious of what I see, but I know I am conscious of it. Also I am conscious of myself as a separate entity and personality and I can stand apart from myself and contemplate myself, and can analyze and judge the operations of my own mind as I would analyze and judge anything else. This self consciousness is only possible after the formation of concepts and the consequent birth of language. Upon self consciousness is based all dis- tinctively human life so far, except what has proceeded from the few cosmic conscious minds of the last three thousand years. Finally the basic fact in cosmic consciousness is implied in its name—that fact is consciousness of the cosmos—this is what is called in the East the " Brahmic Splendor," which is in Dante's phrase capable of transhumanizing a man into a god. Whitman, who has an immense deal to say about it, speaks of it in one place as " in- effable light—light rare, untellable, lighting the very light—beyond all signs, descriptions, languages." This consciousness shows the cosmos to consist not of dead matter governed by unconscious, rigid, and unintending law; it shows it on the contrary as entirely immaterial, entirely spiritual and entirely alive; it shows that death is an absurdity, that everyone and everything has/ eternal life ; it shows that the universe is God and that God is the universe, and that no evil ever did or ever will enter into it ; a great deal of this is, of course, from the point of view of self consciousness, absurd; it is neverthe- less undoubtedly true. Now all this does not mean that when a man has cosmic consciousness he knows everything about the universe. We all know that when at three years of age we acquired self consciousness we did not at once know all about ourselves; we know, on the contrary, that after a great many thousands of years of experience of himself man still to-day knows comparatively little about himself considered even as a self conscious per- sonality. So neither does a man know all about the cosmos merely because he becomes conscious of it. If it has taken the race several hundred thou- sand years to learn a smattering of the science of humanity since its aqui- sition of self consciousness, so it may take it millions of years to acquire a smattering of the science of God after its acquisition of cosmic consciousness. As on self consciousness is based the human world as we see it with all its works and ways, so on cosmic consciousness is based the higher religions and the higher philosophies and what comes from them, and on it will be based, when it becomes more general, a new world of which it would be idle to try to speak to-day. The philosophy of the birth of cosmic consciousness in the individual is very similar to that of the birth of self consciousness. The mind becomes First Words 15 overcrowded (as it were) with concepts and these are constantly becoming larger, more numerous and more and more complex; some day (the condi- tions being all favorable) the fusion, or what might be called the chemical union, of several of them and of certain moral elements takes place ; the result is an intuition and the establishment of the intuitional mind, or, in other words, cosmic consciousness. The scheme by which the mind is built up is uniform from beginning to end : a recept is made of many percepts; a concept of many or several re- cepts and percepts, and an intuition is made of many concepts, recepts and percepts together with other elements belonging to and drawn from the moral nature. The cosmic vision or the cosmic intuition, from which what may be called the new mind takes its name, is thus seen to be simply the complex and union of all prior thought and experience—just as self consciousness is the complex and union of all thought and experience prior to it.
Resumen: "Conciencia cosmica"
The present volume is an attempt to answer this question ; but notwithstanding it seems well to make a short pref- atory statement in as plain language as possible so as to open the door, as it were, for the more elaborate exposition to be attempted in the body of the work. Cosmic Conciousness, then, is a higher form of consciousness than that possessed by the ordinary man. This last is called Self Consciousness and is that faculty upon which rests all of our life (both subjective and objec- tive) which is not common to us and the higher animals, except that small part of it which is derived from the few individuals who have had the higher consciousness above named. To make the matter clear it must be under- stood that there are three forms or grades of consciousness, (i) Simple Consciousness, which is possessed by say the upper half of the animal king- dom. By means of this faculty a dog or a horse is just as conscious of the things about him as a man is; he is also conscious of his own limbs and body and he knows that these are a part of himself. (2) Over and above this Simple Consciousness, which is possessed by man as by animals, man has another which is called Self Consciousness. By virtue of this faculty man is not only conscious of trees, rocks, waters, his own limbs and body, but he becomes conscious of himself as a distinct entity apart from all the rest of the universe. It is as good as certain that no animal can realize him- self in that way. Further, by means of self consciousness, man (who knows as the animal knows) becomes capable of treating his own mental states as objects of consciousness. The animal is, as it were, immersed in his con- sciousness as a fish in the sea; he cannot, even in imagination, get outside of it for one moment so as to realize it. But man by virtue of self conscious- ness can step aside, as it were, from himself and think: "Yes, that thought that I had about that matter is true; I know it is true and I know that I know it is true." The writer has been asked : "How do you know that ani- mals cannot think in the same manner?" The answer is simple and conclu- sive—it is: There is no evidence that any animal can so think, but if they could we should soon know it. Between two creatures living together, as dogs or horses and men, and each self conscious, it would be the simplest 2 Cosmic Consciousness matter in the world to open up communication. Even as it is, diverse as is our psychology, we do, by watching his acts, enter into the dog's mind pretty freely—we see what is going on there—we know that the dog sees and hears, smells and tastes—we know that he has intelligence—adapts means to ends —that he reasons. If he was self conscious we must have learned it long ago. We have not learned it and it is as good as certain that no dog, horse, elephant or ape ever was self conscious. Another thing : on man's self con- sciousness is built everything in and about us distinctively human. Lan guage is the objective of which self consciousness is the subjective. Self con sciousness and language (two in one, for they are two halves of the same thing) are the sine qua non of human social life, of manners, of institutions, of industries of all kinds, of all arts useful and fine. If any animal pos- sessed self consciousness it seems certain that it would upon that master fac- ulty build (as man has done) a superstructure of language; of reasoned out customs, industries, art. But no animal has done this, therefore we infer that no animal has self consciousness.
The possession of self consciousness and language (its other self) by man creates an enormous gap between him and the highest creature possessing simple consciousness merely.
Cosmic Consciousness is a third form which is as far above Self Con- sciousness as is that above Simple Consciousness. With this form, of course, both simple and self consciousness persist (as simple cosciousness persists when self consciousness is acquired), but added to them is the new faculty so often named and to be named in this volume. The prime characteristic of cosmic consciousness is, as its name implies, a consciousness of the cos- mos, that is, of the life and order of the universe. What these words mean cannot be touched upon here ; it is the business of this volume to throw some light upon them. There are many elements belonging to the cosmic sense besides the central fact just alluded to. Of these a few may be men- tioned. Along with the consciousness of the cosmos there occurs an intel- lectual enlightenment or illumination which alone would place the individual on a new plane of existence—would make him almost a member of a new species. To this is added a state of moral exaltation, an indescribable feel- ing of elevation, elation, and joyousness, and a quickening of the moral sense, which is fully as striking and more important both to the individual and to the race than is the enhanced intellectual power. With these come, what may be called, a sense of immortality, a consciousness of eternal life, not a conviction that he shall have this, but the consciousness that he has it already.
Only a personal experience of it, or a prolonged study of men who have First Words 3 passed into the new life, will enable us to realize what this actually is ; but it has seemed to the present writer that to pass in review, even briefly and imperfectly, instances in which the condition in question has existed would be worth while. He expects his work to be useful in two ways: First, in broadening the general view of human life by comprehending in our mental vision this important phase of it, and by enabling us to realize, in some measure, the true status of certain men who, down to the present, are either exalted, by the average self conscious individual, to the rank of gods, or, adopting the other extreme, are adjudged insane. And in the second place he hopes to furnish aid to his fellow men in a far more practical and impor- tant sense. The view he takes is that our descendants will sooner or later reach, as a race, the condition of cosmic consciousness, just as, long ago, our ancestors passed from simple to self consciousness. He believes that this step in evolution is even now being made, since it is clear to him both that men with the faculty in question are becoming more and more common and also that as a race we are approaching nearer and nearer to that stage of the self conscious mind from which the transition to the cosmic conscious is effected. He realizes that, granted the necessary heredity, any individual not already beyond the age may enter cosmic consciousness. He knows that intelligent contact with cosmic conscious minds assists self conscious indi- viduals in the ascent to the higher plane. He therefore hopes, by bringing about, or at least facilitating this contact, to aid men and women in making the almost infinitely important step in question.
II. The immediate future of our race, the writer thinks, is indescribably hope- ful. There are at the present moment impending over us three revolutions, the least of which would dwarf the ordinary historic upheaval called by that name into absolute insignificance. They are : (1) The material, economic and social revolution which will depend upon and result from the establish- ment of aerial navigation. (2) The economic and social revolution which will abolish individual ownership and rid the earth at once of two immense evils—riches and poverty. And (3) The psychical revolution of which there is here question.
Either of the first two would (and will) radically change the conditions of, and greatly uplift, human life ; but the third will do more for humanity than both of the former, were their importance multiplied by hundreds or even thousands.
4 Cosmi c Consciousnes s The three operating (as they will) together will literally create a new heaven and a new earth. Old things will be done away and all will become new. Before aerial navigation national boundaries, tariffs, and perhaps distinc- tions of language will fade out. Great cities will no longer have reason for being and will melt away. The men who now dwell in cities will inhabit in summer the mountains and the sea shores ; building often in airy and beau- tiful spots, now almost or quite inaccessible, commanding the most extensive and magnificent views. In the winter they will probably dwell in communi- ties of moderate size. As the herding together, as now, in great cities, so the isolation of the worker of the soil will become a thing of the past. Space will be practically annihilated, there will be no crowding together and no enforced solitude.
Before Socialism crushing toil, cruel anxiety, insulting and demoralizing riches, poverty and its ills will become subjects for historical novels. In contact with the flux of cosmic consciousness all religions known and named to-day will be melted down. The human soul will be revolutionized. Religion will absolutely dominate the race. It will not depend on tradition. It will not be believed and disbelieved. It will not be a part of life, belong- ing to certain hours, times, occasions. It will not be in sacred books nor in the mouths of priests. It will not dwell in churches and meetings and forms and days. Its life will not be in prayers, hymns nor discourses. It will not depend on special revelations, on the words of gods who came down to teach, nor on any bible or bibles. It will have no mission to save men from their sins or to secure them entrance to heaven. It will not teach a future immortality nor future glories, for immortality and all glory will exist in the here and now. The evidence of immortality will live in every heart as sight in every eye. Doubt of God and of eternal life will be as impossible as is now doubt of existence; the evidence of each will be the same. Religion will govern every minute of every day of all life. Churches, priests, forms, creeds, prayers, all agents, all intermediaries between the individual man and God will be permanently replaced by direct unmistakable intercourse. Sin will no longer exist nor will salvation be desired. Men will not worry about death or a future, about the kingdom of heaven, about what may come with and after the cessation of the life of the present body. Each soul will feel and know itself to be immortal, will feel and know that the entire universe with all its good and with all its beauty is for it and belongs to it forever. The world peopled by men possessing cosmic consciousness will be as far removed from the world of to-day as this is from the world as it was before the advent of self consciousness. First Words 5 III. There is a tradition, probably very old, to the effect that the first man was innocent and happy until he ate of the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. That having eaten thereof he became aware that he was naked and was ashamed. Further, that then sin was born into the world, the miserable sense whereof replaced man's former feeling of innocency. That then and not till then man began to labor and to cover his body. Stranger than all (so it seems to us), the story runs, that along with this change or immediately following upon it there came into man's mind the remarkable conviction which has never since left it but which has been kept alive by its own inherent vitality and by the teaching of all true seers, prophets and poets that this accursed thing which has bitten man's heel (laming him, hin- dering his progress and especially making this halting and painful) should eventually be crushed and subjugated by man himself—by the rising up within him of a Saviour—the Christ.
Man's progenitor was a creature (an animal) walking erect but with sim- ple consciousness merely. He was (as are to-day the animals) incapable of sin or of the feeling of sin and equally incapable of shame (at least in the human sense). He had no feeling or knowledge of good and evil. He as yet knew nothing of what we call work and had never labored. From this state he fell (or rose) into self consciousness, his eyes were opened, he knew that he was naked, he felt shame, acquired the sense of sin (became in fact what is called a sinner), and learned to do certain things in order to encom- pass certain ends—that is, he learned to labor.
For weary eons this condition has lasted—the sense of sin still haunts his pathway—by the sweat of his brow he still eats bread—he is still ashamed. Where is the deliverer, the Saviour ? Who or what ?
The Saviour of man is Cosmic Consciousness—in Paul's language—the Christ. The cosmic sense (in whatever mind it appears) crushes the ser- pent's head—destroys sin, shame, the sense of good and evil as contrasted one with the other, and will annihilate labor, though not human activity.
The fact that there came to man along with or immediately after his acqui- sition of self consciousness the inchoate premonition of another and higher consciousness which was yet, at that time, many milleniums in the future is surely most noteworthy though not necessarily surprising. We have in biology many analogous facts such as premonition of, and preparation for, by the individual of states and circumstances of which he has had no experience and we see the same thing in the maternal instinct in the very young girl.
6 Cosmic Consciousness Th e universal scheme is woven in one piece and is permeable to con- sciousness or (and especially) to sub-consciousness throughout and in every direction. The universe is a vast, grandiose, terrible, multiform yet uni- form evolution. The section which especially concerns us is that which extends from brute to man, from man to demigod, and constitutes the im- posing drama of humanity—its scene the surface of the planet—its time a million years. IV. The purpose of these preliminary remarks is to throw as much light as possible on the subject of this volume, so as to increase the pleasure and profit of its perusal. A personal exposition of the writer's own introduction to the main fact treated of will perhaps do as much as anything else could to further this end. He will therefore frankly set down here a very brief outline of his early mental life and give a short account of his slight experience of what he calls cosmic consciousness. The reader will readily see therefrom whence came the ideas and convictions presented in the following pages. He was born of good middle class English stock and grew up almost without education on what was then a backwoods Canadian farm. As a child he assisted in such labor as lay within his power. Tended cattle, horses, sheep, pigs ; brought in firewood, worked in the hay field, drove oxen and horses, ran errands. His pleasures were as simple as his labors. An occa- sional visit to a neighboring small town, a game of ball, bathing in the creek that ran through his father's farm, the making and sailing of mimic ships, the search for birds' eggs and flowers in the spring, and for wild fruits in the summer and fall, afforded him, with his skates and handsled in the winter, his homely, much loved recreations. While still a young boy he read with keen appreciation Marryat's novels, Scott's poems and novels, and other similar books dealing with outdoor nature and human life. He never, even as a child, accepted the doctrines of the Christian church ; but, as soon as old enough to dwell at all on such themes, conceived that Jesus was a man— great and good no doubt, but a man. That no one would ever be con- demned to everlasting pain. That if a conscious God existed he was the supreme master and meant well in the end to all ; but that, this visible life here being ended, it was doubtful, or more than doubtful, whether conscious identity would be preserved. The boy (even the child) dwelt on these and similar topics far more than anyone would suppose ; but probably not more than many other introspective small fellow mortals. He was subject at times to a sort of ecstasy of curiosity and hope. As on one special occasion when about ten years old he earnestly longed to die that the secrets of the beyond, First Words 7 if there was any beyond, might be revealed to him ; also to agonies of anxiety and terror, as for instance, at about the same age he read Reynold's "Faust," and, being near its end one sunny afternoon, he laid it down utterly unable to continue its perusal, and went out into the sunshine to recover from the horror (after more than fifty years he distinctly recalls it) which had seized him. The boy's mother died when he was only a few years old, and his father shortly afterwards. The outward circumstances of his life in some respects became more unhappy than can readily be told. At sixteen the boy left home to live or die as might happen. For five years he wandered over North Amer- ica from the great Lakes to the Gulf of Mexico and from the Upper Ohio to San Francisco. He worked on farms, on railways, on steamboats, and in the placer diggings of Western Nevada. Several times he nearly suffered ship- wreck by sickness, starvation, freezing, and once on the banks of the Hum- boldt River, in Utah, fought for his life half a day with the Shoshone Indians. After five years' wandering, at the age of twenty-one, he returned to the country where his childhood had been passed. A moderate sum of money from his dead mother enabled him to spend some years in study, and his mind, after lying so long fallow, absorbed ideas with extraordinary facility. He graduated with high honors four years after his return from the Pacific Coast. Outside of the collegiate course he read with avidity many speculative books, such as the " Origin of Species," Tyndall's " Heat" and " Essays, " Buckle's " History," " Essays and Reviews," and much poetry, especially such as seemed to him free and fearless. In this species of literature he soon pre- ferred Shelley, and of his poems, "Adonias" and "Prometheus" were his favorites. His life for some years was one passionate note of interrogation, an unappeasable hunger for enlightenment on the basic problems. Leaving college, he continued his search with the same ardor. Taught himself French that he might read Auguste Comte, Hugo and Renan, and German that he might read Goethe, especially "Faust." At the age of thirty he fell in with " Leaves of Grass," and at once saw that it contained, in greater measure than any book so far found, what he had so long been looking for. He read the " Leaves " eagerly, even passionately, but for several years derived little from them. At last light broke and there was revealed to him (as far per- haps as such things can be revealed) at least some of the meanings. Then occurred that to which the foregoing is preface. It was in the early spring, at the beginning of his thirty-sixth year. He and two friends had spent the evening reading Wordsworth, Shelley, Keats, Browning, and especially Whitman. They parted at midnight, and he had a long drive in a hansom (it was in an English city). His mind, deeply 8 Cosmic Consciousness under the influence of the ideas, images and emotions called up by the reading and talk of the evening, was calm and peaceful. He was in a state of quiet, almost passive enjoyment. All at once, without warning of any kind, he found himself wrapped around as it were by a flame-colored cloud. For an instant he thought of fire, some sudden conflagration in the great city; the next he knew that the light was within himself. Directly after- wards came upon him a sense of exultation, of immense joyousness accom- panied or immediately followed by an intellectual illumination quite impos- sible to describe. Into his brain streamed one momentary lightning-flash of the Brahmic Splendor which has ever since lightened his life; upon his heart fell one drop of Brahmic Bliss, leaving thenceforward for always an after taste of heaven. Among other things he did not come to believe, he saw and knew that the Cosmos is not dead matter but a living Presence, that the soul of man is immortal, that the universe is so built and ordered that without any peradventure all things work together for the good of each and all, that the foundation principle of the world is what we call love and that the happiness of every one is in the long run absolutely certain. He claims that he learned more within the few seconds during which the illumi- nation lasted than in previous months or even years of study, and that he learned much that no study could ever have taught. The illumination itself continued not more than a few moments, but its effects proved ineffaceable ; it was impossible for him ever to forget what he at that time saw and knew; neither did he, or could he, ever doubt the truth of what was then presented to his mind. There was no return that night or at any other time of the experience. He subsequently wrote a book (28a.) in which he sought to embody the teaching of the illumination. Some who read it thought very highly of it, but (as was to be expected for many reasons) it had little circulation. The supreme occurrence of that night was his real and sole initiation to the new and higher order of ideas. But it was only an initiation. He saw the light but had no more idea whence it came and what it meant than had the first creature that saw the light of the sun. Years afterwards he met C. P., of whom he had often heard as having extraordinary spiritual insight. He found that C. P. had entered the higher life of which he had had a glimpse and had had a large experience of its phenomena. His conversa- tion with C. P. threw a flood of light upon the true meaning of what he had himself experienced. Looking round then upon the world of man, he saw the significance of the subjective light in the case of Paul and in that of Mohammed. The secret First Words 9 of Whitman's transcendent greatness was revealed to him. Certain conver- sations with J. H. J. and with J. B. helped him not a little. Personal inter- course with Edward Carpenter, T. S. R., C. M. C. and M. C. L. assisted greatly in the broadening and clearing up of his speculations, in the extension and co-ordination of his thought. But much time and labor were still required before the germinal concept could be satisfactorily elaborated and matured, the idea, namely, that there exists a family sprung from, living among, but scarcely forming a part of ordinary humanity, whose members are spread abroad throughout the advanced races of mankind and throughout the last forty centuries of the world's history. The trait that distinguishes these people from other men is this: Their spiritual eyes have been opened and they have seen. The better known members of this group who, were they collected together, could be accomo- dated all at one time in a modern drawing-room, have created all the great modern religions, beginning with Taoism and Buddhism, and speaking gen- erally have created, through religion and literature, modern civilization. Not that they have contributed any large numerical proportion of the books which have been written, but that they have produced the few books which have inspired the larger number of all that have been written in modern times. These men dominate the last twenty-five, especially the last five, centuries as stars of the first magnitude dominate the midnight sky. A man is identified as a member of this family by the fact that at a certain age he has passed through a new birth and risen to a higher spiritual plane. The reality of the new birth is demonstrated by the subjective light and other phenomena. The object of the present volume is to teach others what little the writer himself has been able to learn of the spiritual status of this new race. V. It remains to say a few words upon the psychological origin of what is called in this book Cosmic Consciousness, which must not be looked upon as being in any sense supernatural or supranormal—as anything more or less than a natural growth. Although in the birth of Cosmic Consciousness the moral nature plays an important part, it will be better for many reasons to confine our attention at present to the evolution of the intellect. In this evolution there are four distinct steps. The first of them was taken when upon the primary quality of excitability sensation was established. At this point began the acquisition and more or less perfect registration of sense impressions—that is, of percepts. 10 Cosmic Consciousness A percept is of course a sense impression—a sound is heard or an object seen and the impression made is a percept. If we could go back far enough we should find among our ancestors a creature whose whole intellect was made up simply of these percepts. But this creature (whatever name it ought to bear) had in it what may be called an eligibility of growth, and what happened with it was something like this: Individually and from generation to generation it accumulated these percepts, the constant repetition of which, calling for further and further registration, led, in the struggle for existence and, under the law of natural selection, to an accumulation of cells in the cen- tral sense ganglia; the multiplication of cells made further registration pos- sible ; that, again, made further growth of the ganglia necessary, and so on. At last a condition was reached in which it became possible for our ancestor to combine groups of these percepts into what we to-day call a recept. This process is very similar to that of composite photography. Similar percepts (as of a tree) are registered one over the other until (the nerve center having become competent to the task) they are generalized into, as it were, one per- cept ; but that compound percept is neither more nor less than a recept—a something that has been received. Now the work of accumulation begins again on a higher plane: the sensory organs keep steadily at work manufacturing percepts; the receptual centers keep steadily at work manufacturing more and yet more recepts from the old and the new percepts; the capacities of the central ganglia are con- stantly taxed to do the necessary registration of percepts, the necessary elab- oration of these into recepts and the necessary registration of recepts; then as the ganglia by use and selection are improved they constantly manufacture from percepts and from the initial simple recepts, more and more complex, that is, higher and higher recepts. At last, after many thousands of generations have lived and died, comes a time when the mind of the animal we are considering has reached the highest possible point of purely receptual intelligence ; the accumulation of percepts and of recepts has gone on until no greater stores of impressions can be laid up and no further elaboration of these can be accomplished on the plane of receptual intelligence. Then another break is made and the higher recepts are replaced by concepts. The relation of a concept to a recept is somewhat similar to the relation of algebra to arithmetic. A recept is, as I have said, a composite image of hundreds, perhaps thousands, of percepts ; it is itself an image abstracted from many images ; but a concept is that same composite image—that same recept—named, ticketed, and, as it were, dismissed. A concept is in fact neither more nor less than a named First Word s 11 recept—the name, that is, the sign (as in algebra), standing henceforth for the thing itself, that is, for the recept. Now it is as clear as day to any one who will give the least thought to the subject, that the revolution by which concepts are substituted for recepts increases the efficiency of the brain for thought as much as the introduction of machinery increased the capacity of the race for work—or as much as the use of algebra increases the power of the mind in mathematical calcula- tions. To replace a great cumbersome recept by a simple sign was almost like replacing actual goods—as wheat, fabrics and hardware—by entries in the ledger. But, as hinted above, in order that a recept may be replaced by a concept it must be named, or, in other words, marked with a sign which stands for it —just as a check stands for a piece of baggage or as an entry in a ledger stands for a piece of goods ; in other words, the race that is in possession of concepts is also, and necessarily, in possession of language. Further, it should be noted, as the possession of concepts implies the possession of lan- guage, so the possession of concepts and language (which are in reality two aspects of the same thing) implies the possession of self consciousness. All this means that there is a moment in the evolution of mind when the re- ceptual intellect, capable of simple consciousness only, becomes almost or quite instantaneously a conceptual intellect in possession of language and self consciousness. When we say that an individual, whether an adult individual long ago or a child to-day does not matter, came into possession of concepts, of language and of self consciousness in an instant, we, of course, mean that the indi- vidual came into possession of self consciousness and of one or a few con- cepts and of one or a few true words instantaneously and not that he entered into possession of a whole language in that short time. In the history of the individual man the point in question is reached and passed at about the age of three years; in the history of the race it was reached and passed several hundred thousand years ago. We have now, in our analysis, reached the point where we each individ- ually stand, the point, namely, of the conceptual, self conscious mind. In acquiring this new and higher form of consciousness it must not for a moment be supposed that we have dropped either our receptual intelligence or our old perceptual mind ; as a matter of fact we could not live without these any more than could the animal who has no other mind than them. Our intellect, then, to-day is made up of a very complex mixture of percepts, recepts and concepts. 12 Cosmi c Consciousnes s Let us now for a moment consider the concept. This may be considered as a large and complex recept; but larger and more complex than any recept. It is made up of one or more recepts combined with probably sev- eral percepts. This extremely complex recept is then marked by a sign ; that is, jt is named and in virtue of its name it becomes a concept. The concept, after being named or marked, is (as it were) laid away, just as a piece of checked baggage is marked by its check and piled in the baggage-room. By means of this check we can send the trunk to any part of America without ever seeing it or knowing just where it is at a given moment. So by means of their signs we can build concepts into elaborate calculations, into poems and into systems of philosophy, without knowing half the time anything about the thing represented by the individual concepts that we are using. And here a remark must be made aside from the main argument. It has been noticed thousands of times that the brain of a thinking man does not exceed in size the brain of a non-thinking wild man in anything like the pro- portion in which the mind of the thinker exceeds the mind of the savage. The reason is that the brain of a Herbert Spencer has very little more work to do than has the brain of a native Australian, for this reason, that Spencer does all his characteristic mental work by signs or counters which stand for concepts, while the savage does all or nearly all his by means of cumbersome recepts. The savage is in a position comparable to that of the astronomer who makes his calculations by arithmetic, while Spencer is in the position of one who makes them by algebra. The first will fill many great sheets of paper with figures and go through immense labor; the other will make the same calculations on an envelope and with comparatively little mental work. The next chapter in the story is the accumulation of concepts. This is a double process. From the age, we will say, of three years each one accu- mulates year by year a larger and larger number, while at the same time the individual concepts are becoming constantly more and more complex. Con- sider for instance the concept science as it exists in the mind of a boy and of a middle aged thinking man ; with the former it stood for a few dozen or a few hundred facts; with the latter for many thousands. Is there to be any limit to this growth of concepts in number and com- plexity ? Whoever will seriously consider that question will see that there must be a limit. No such process could go on to infinity. Should nature attempt such a feat the brain would have to grow until it could no longer be fed and a condition of deadlock be reached which would forbid further progress. Firs t Word s 13 We have seen that the expansion of the perceptual mind had a necessary limit; that its own continued life led it inevitably up to and into the recep- tual mind. That the receptual mind by its own growth was inevitably led up to and into the conceptual mind. A priori considerations make it certain that a corresponding outlet will be found for the conceptual mind. But we do not need to depend on abstract reasoning to demonstrate the necessary existence of the supra conceptual mind, since it exists and can be studied with no more difficulty than other natural phenomena. The supra conceptual intellect, the elements of which instead of being concepts are intuitions, is already (in small numbers it is true) an established fact, and the form of consciousness that belongs to that intellect may be called and has been called—Cosmic Consciousness. Thus we have four distinct stages of intellect, all abundantly illustrated in the animal and human worlds about us—all equally illustrated in the indi- vidual growth of the cosmic conscious mind and all four existing together in that mind as the first three exist together in the ordinary human mind. These four stages are, first, the perceptual mind—the mind made up of per- cepts or sense impressions; second, the mind made up of these and recepts —the so called receptual mind, or in other words the mind of simple con- sciousness; third, we have the mind made up of percepts, recepts and con- cepts, called sometimes the conceptual mind or otherwise the self conscious mind—the mind of self consciousness; and, fourth, and last, we have the intuitional mind—the mind whose highest element is not a recept or a con- cept but an intuition. This is the mind in which sensation, simple conscious- ness and self consciousness are supplemented and crowned with cosmic consciousness. But it is necessary to show more clearly still the nature of these four stages and their relation one to the other. The perceptual or sensational stage of intellect is easy enough to understand, so may be passed by in this place with only one remark, namely, that in a mind made up wholly of per- cepts there is no consciousness of any sort. When, however, the receptual mind comes into existence simple consciousness is born, which means that animals are conscious (as we know they are) of the things they see about them. But the receptual mind is capable of simple consciousness only— that is, the animal is conscious of the object which he sees, but he does not know he is conscious of it; neither is the animal conscious of itself as a dis- tinct entity or personality. In still other words, the animal cannot stand outside of itself and look at itself as any self conscious creature can. This, then, is simple consciousness: to be conscious of the things about one, but 14 Cosmic Consciousness not to be conscious of one's self. But when I have reached self consciousness I am not only conscious of what I see, but I know I am conscious of it. Also I am conscious of myself as a separate entity and personality and I can stand apart from myself and contemplate myself, and can analyze and judge the operations of my own mind as I would analyze and judge anything else. This self consciousness is only possible after the formation of concepts and the consequent birth of language. Upon self consciousness is based all dis- tinctively human life so far, except what has proceeded from the few cosmic conscious minds of the last three thousand years. Finally the basic fact in cosmic consciousness is implied in its name—that fact is consciousness of the cosmos—this is what is called in the East the " Brahmic Splendor," which is in Dante's phrase capable of transhumanizing a man into a god. Whitman, who has an immense deal to say about it, speaks of it in one place as " in- effable light—light rare, untellable, lighting the very light—beyond all signs, descriptions, languages." This consciousness shows the cosmos to consist not of dead matter governed by unconscious, rigid, and unintending law; it shows it on the contrary as entirely immaterial, entirely spiritual and entirely alive; it shows that death is an absurdity, that everyone and everything has/ eternal life ; it shows that the universe is God and that God is the universe, and that no evil ever did or ever will enter into it ; a great deal of this is, of course, from the point of view of self consciousness, absurd; it is neverthe- less undoubtedly true. Now all this does not mean that when a man has cosmic consciousness he knows everything about the universe. We all know that when at three years of age we acquired self consciousness we did not at once know all about ourselves; we know, on the contrary, that after a great many thousands of years of experience of himself man still to-day knows comparatively little about himself considered even as a self conscious per- sonality. So neither does a man know all about the cosmos merely because he becomes conscious of it. If it has taken the race several hundred thou- sand years to learn a smattering of the science of humanity since its aqui- sition of self consciousness, so it may take it millions of years to acquire a smattering of the science of God after its acquisition of cosmic consciousness. As on self consciousness is based the human world as we see it with all its works and ways, so on cosmic consciousness is based the higher religions and the higher philosophies and what comes from them, and on it will be based, when it becomes more general, a new world of which it would be idle to try to speak to-day. The philosophy of the birth of cosmic consciousness in the individual is very similar to that of the birth of self consciousness. The mind becomes First Words 15 overcrowded (as it were) with concepts and these are constantly becoming larger, more numerous and more and more complex; some day (the condi- tions being all favorable) the fusion, or what might be called the chemical union, of several of them and of certain moral elements takes place ; the result is an intuition and the establishment of the intuitional mind, or, in other words, cosmic consciousness. The scheme by which the mind is built up is uniform from beginning to end : a recept is made of many percepts; a concept of many or several re- cepts and percepts, and an intuition is made of many concepts, recepts and percepts together with other elements belonging to and drawn from the moral nature. The cosmic vision or the cosmic intuition, from which what may be called the new mind takes its name, is thus seen to be simply the complex and union of all prior thought and experience—just as self consciousness is the complex and union of all thought and experience prior to it.
Resumen: "Conciencia cosmica"
Aldous Huxley: The Gravity of Light (1996) Oliver Hockenhull VO
Aldous Huxley: The Gravity Of Light incorporates rare archival footage, computer rendered 3D animation, speculative fictions, and selections from his essays. The film begins by reflecting upon that crucial, prophetic work "Brave New World" (1932, Aldous Huxley) and then moves to a further inquiry into the human ramifications of current technological change. The film also recalls the impact of Huxley's LSD-25 and mescaline experimentations and writings for a generation of youth and examines the utopianistic impulses associated with the Rave scene. Written by Anonymous
Enlace megaupload: http://www.megaupload.com/?d=UPOE858H
martes, 4 de octubre de 2011
Hidden in Plain Sight (La escuela de las Américas) John Smihula (2003)
Cada Noviembre, miles de personas de todo EEUU se reúnen frente a Fort Benning, Georgia, formando una de las mayores demostraciones pacifistas en los EEU desde la guerra de Vietnam. El asunto es la controvertida Escuela de las Américas (School Of Americas - SOA), donde más de 60,000 soldados latinoamericanos han sido adiestrados, entre ellos dictadores como Manuel Noriega en Panamá y líderes de los Escuadrones de la Muerte como Roberto D’Aubuisson en El Salvador.
Las innumerables pruebas denuncian a la Escuela de las Américas como una "Escuela de Asesinos", pero los oficiales militares mantienen la opinión de que la escuela ha jugado un papel crucial en llevar la democracia y la estabilidad a Latinoamérica. En este asunto, el Congreso de EEUU está drásticamente dividido. Intelectuales como Noam Chomsky, Eduardo Galeano, Christopher Hitchens, y Michael Parenti, amplían el debate para incluir temas tales como el militarismo, la globalización, la seguridad nacional y el terrorismo internacional. Testimonios personales de víctimas de la violencia y represión en Latinoamérica plantean preguntas y preocupaciones acerca de las verdaderas metas de la política exterior de los EEUU.
Informativo y provocativo, este documental presenta diferentes puntos de vista que clarifican la turbulenta realidad de Latinoamérica, desmitifican el proceso de toma de decisiones, y arrojan luz sobre algunos de los mas complejos y urgentes problemas a los que se enfrentan los ciudadanos de EEUU en la actualidad. Una corta historia, un debate animoso, una historia personal, y una llamada a la responsabilidad, "Hidden in plain sight" es una atrevida y firme exposición, sobre la naturaleza y consecuencias de la política de Estados Unidos en Latinoamérica.
www.HiddenInPlainSight.org
Enlace descarga: Docuselrond
Las innumerables pruebas denuncian a la Escuela de las Américas como una "Escuela de Asesinos", pero los oficiales militares mantienen la opinión de que la escuela ha jugado un papel crucial en llevar la democracia y la estabilidad a Latinoamérica. En este asunto, el Congreso de EEUU está drásticamente dividido. Intelectuales como Noam Chomsky, Eduardo Galeano, Christopher Hitchens, y Michael Parenti, amplían el debate para incluir temas tales como el militarismo, la globalización, la seguridad nacional y el terrorismo internacional. Testimonios personales de víctimas de la violencia y represión en Latinoamérica plantean preguntas y preocupaciones acerca de las verdaderas metas de la política exterior de los EEUU.
Informativo y provocativo, este documental presenta diferentes puntos de vista que clarifican la turbulenta realidad de Latinoamérica, desmitifican el proceso de toma de decisiones, y arrojan luz sobre algunos de los mas complejos y urgentes problemas a los que se enfrentan los ciudadanos de EEUU en la actualidad. Una corta historia, un debate animoso, una historia personal, y una llamada a la responsabilidad, "Hidden in plain sight" es una atrevida y firme exposición, sobre la naturaleza y consecuencias de la política de Estados Unidos en Latinoamérica.
www.HiddenInPlainSight.org
Enlace descarga: Docuselrond
Suscribirse a:
Entradas (Atom)